
As I continue to figure out just how in the hell I’m going to support a political party that cowers and capitulates at every turn to our criminal ruling regime, I happened to come across
this editorial in the New York Times today which should be required reading for every single member of the Democratic Party (regarding the shameless sellout by Congress on FISA, aided and abetted by a handful of “Democrats” including
Sideshow Bob Casey).
Yes, I’m still angry. I’m going to be angry for a little while.
And with this in mind, I should let you know that I came across
the following letter in the New York Times recently from Marc Dunkelman, whose title is “Director of the Ideas Primary Democratic Leadership Council” (?) written in response to a column by Noam Scheiber called “The Centrists Didn’t Hold”…
Mr. Scheiber’s contention that the Democratic Leadership Council believes that the “teachers unions endanger the republic” must have come as a surprise to the teachers union, which sponsored the National Conversation in Nashville.
Moreover, despite his insinuation, the D.L.C. did not support the bankruptcy bill in 2005. But worse, he did not bring any historical perspective into his analysis.
During the third year of every presidential cycle, candidates looking to court the left choose not to attend the D.L.C.’s National Conversation. That was true in 1999, and again in 2003. But during each subsequent year, like clockwork, the Democratic nominee keynotes the National Conversation, cognizant that any Democrat hoping to win a national election needs to win swing votes in the middle of the electorate.
So if history is any guide, we’ll see the Democratic nominee in 2008. Only one political strategy and governing philosophy has successfully propelled Democrats into the White House during the last 30 years: the New Democratic philosophy generated by the D.L.C. and championed by President Bill Clinton.
Fortunately for all Democrats, despite Mr. Scheiber’s histrionics, all three Democratic front-runners indicate that they would govern with the type of centrist ideas the D.L.C. has championed for a generation.
Marc Dunkelman
Director of the Ideas Primary Democratic Leadership Council
Washington, Aug. 2, 2007
Gee, Marc, I guess it would have been nice if the Democratic candidates for president had actually
shown up at the “National Conversation” to tell you that, wouldn’t it (bad luck there, dude). And smooth move to blow off Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson, by the way – I’m not paying much attention to them either, but then again, I’m just a lowly, unkempt liberal blogger, not the “Director of the Ideas Primary Democratic Leadership Council” (?).
If Dunkelman believes that Scheiber “did not bring any historical perspective” into his analysis of how Dunkelman’s precious DLC Democrats completely and utterly caved on the 2005 Bankruptcy Bill, then please allow me to do so here:
this is a link to Senate vote total on the bill, and
this is a link to the House vote total.
I’ll save a bit of time and summarize those Dems who voted for that awful bill in the Senate:
Baucus
Bayh
Biden
Bingaman
Byrd
Carper
Conrad
Inouye
Johnson
Kohl
Landrieu
Lincoln
Bill Nelson
Ben Nelson
Pryor
Reid
Salazar
Stabenow
I’m not going to bother doing that for the House, but suffice to say that “Democrat” Tim Holden is on that list, among way too many others.
My guess is that many of those people from both the Senate and the House would feel very much at home addressing a DLC gathering, so Dunkelman’s assertion that the DLC did not sponsor the bankruptcy bill is truly laughable.
And I’m so glad that kos wrote
this about the DLC today since that ties in so well to this post. Beyond that, though, kos said
this in 2005 that I think is more resonant than ever now (with respect, I would favor kos’s argument over Ezra Klein’s in a heartbeat).
Now before you start thinking that I have achieved some kind of mind meld with The Great Orange Satan, please understand that I’m trying to put the pieces together and understand how the Democratic Party, despite some notable accomplishments cited in today’s Times editorial, so utterly failed us on the “big picture” stuff.
To me, there is still a yawning chasm between the accomplishments of the progressive netroots and its future goals and inherent philosophy (i.e., the actual truth) and that of the corporatist Beltway mentality of our national party, which strives for accommodation above all else (with those who want nothing but to grind it into the dust, sadly enough).
And again, as it was with today’s kos post, it was a bit of karma I believe that brought news of this ad my way, sponsored by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee…
3 comments:
This guy so rocks!
If I had a couple hundred thousand dollars I would get a Beta tape of it from him and have it run on CNN. At least 5 times.
CNN probably wouldn't accept the advertising for it - good idea, though.
I wish I knew who he was also. I think he deserves a medal. And if he ever makes another one of those spots, I'm going to find a way to get ahold of it and play it constantly (and I'll keep bringing this one back every so often, just enough so people don't get too sick of it).
I couldn't have said it better myself, but I have been saying nearly as good since 1999 and this should be splashed all over everywhere, not just CNN. I mean hack into Oreily's "NO SPIN ZONE" and show him what NO SPIN really means, but then that would mean exposing the nation to Oreilly's descending colon which is where his NO SPIN ZONE and his head is located.
Party on BACK TALK.
Post a Comment