Our "Chicken" Immigration Policy

I know I took a shot at Mike Chertoff already today, but this is over a different issue.

As noted here, he politely chided Senate Repugs who derailed the immigration bill last week, saying that “it would be difficult for the government to crack down on illegal workers.”

This of course is all a gift to the Dems as I previously noted because the Repugs totally let their knuckle-dragging, hammerhead “base” all gather around their radios tuned to talk (hate) radio and their TV sets that have their channels locked forever to FOX so they could listen to their preferred demagogues vent about how horrible it would be to provide a path to citizenship for these people, even though the vast majority of this country supports such a path.

Well, if Chertoff were serious about punishing illegal immigrants, to say nothing of the employers who hire them, he could follow up on other companies besides IFCO Systems North American. As noted here, he could actually investigate mega beef and poultry producer Tyson Foods, for example (hence the post title).

I believe post author Jim Kouri makes a good point when he wonders why Chertoff and DHS aren’t “swarming all over” Tyson plants that the company closes because the suspected illegals are participating in protests, boycotts, and demonstrations (not contesting the right of the illegals to participate, but they should know the risks if they do).

Or does Chertoff keep away from Tyson because the company has been a big campaign donor to both Dubya and the Clintons (hey, they’re allowed to donate to whomever and do whatever is legally allowed, but if they’re harboring illegals, they and any other company that does so should be prosecuted).

I thought this excerpt spoke volumes…

As part of its mission to ensure national security, DHS is charged with enforcing the laws requiring employers to employ only individuals authorized to work in the United States. The Form I-9 requirement stems from Section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act and implementing regulations, which require all U.S. employers (including agricultural associations or employers who recruit or refer persons for employment for a fee) to verify on the Form I-9 the identity and employment eligibility of all employees -- including U.S. citizens -- hired to work in the United States after November 6, 1986.

Completed Forms I-9 are not filed with the federal government. Instead, they must be retained by the employer in its own files and made available for inspection by DHS, the Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, or the Department of Labor for three years after the date of hire or one year after the date the employee's employment is terminated, whichever is later.

Recruiters or referrers for a fee are required to retain the Form I-9 records for three years after the date of the hire. Failure to properly complete and retain the Form I-9 subjects the employer to civil penalties ranging from $110 to $1,100. Hardly a penalty for companies making millions of dollars in profits due to low wages paid to illegal aliens.

So, Mr. Secretary, I would suggest you do some more work on the enforcement end of this equation before you decide to lecture Congress on its role in this boondoggle, because, even though you have a point, this mess was created by the poor-to-nonexistent adherence to existing law regarding the illegals. And now that they’re here and likely to stay for awhile, all you, your party’s politicians and your Repug constituents can do is scream at each other over it.

Patrick And The War

This “Thumbs Up” editorial citation on behalf of Patrick Murphy appeared in the Bucks County Courier Times on Saturday…

To Congressman Patrick Murphy for demonstrating his continuing commitment to fiscal responsibility by voting against a congressional pay raise.

During his campaign, Murphy pledged not to vote for a raise until the minimum wage was increased. And although President Bush signed that increase into law last month, Murphy maintained that, “we are a nation at war and a nation in debt. We all need to do our part to tighten our belts.”

The vote was on a motion to call for an up or down vote on the pay raise since the increase is automatic. The motion failed and the raise was awarded anyway, but Murphy has pledged to donate his raise to charity.

Murphy has said all along that he is a fiscal conservative, further enhanced by his membership in the Democratic Blue Dog Coalition, whose main focus is promoting fiscal responsibility and greater accountability for taxpayer money. As always, we’re glad to see some independence from Murphy and hope he continues to stand up for his convictions, even when they don’t jibe with the majority.

This letter also appeared in the same issue of the paper…

Since the death of our son, PFC Robert H. Dembowski Jr. of the 82nd Airborne on May 24th, we have been overcome with grief. However, our neighbors, community and friends have supported and consoled us with their words, tears, prayers and actions.

There are so many people, many of whom we don’t even know, from up the street and across the country and even around the world, whose kindness has comforted and amazed us. Our son would be touched by all of these gestures. He would appreciate all of these folks helping us in our time of sorrow.

We pray that God will give us all the strength to live the best life we can and to allow peace to thrive in a world that was meant to be peaceful.

Mr. and Mrs. Robert H. Dembowski Sr. and Family
Ivyland, PA

Our sympathies and condolences go out to the Dembowski family, as well as the families of any casualties from this stupid war.

And speaking of the Iraq mess, I thought this Guest Opinion that appeared in the Courier Times the same day as the previous two items was quite eloquent; I hope you agree (and Pat Wandling, by the way, is a totally bald-faced Repug partisan).

Today's Terra Update

Aside from the fact that the terrorist threat level remains at “orange” from Mike (“City of Louisiana”) Chertoff and the DHS, where it has been for over a year (can we at least have a hint as to why?), I really don’t understand the point of this story (and I love the fact that it’s basically composed of quotes and paraphrasing from an interview Chertoff gave to Fox; is CNN now in the business of promoting News Corporation also?).

Here is a story from the Times of London about the two attempted car bombings in that city along with the crash at the Glasgow Airport terminal (and I thought this item at the very end of the story was interesting, but not surprising)…

Sources also denied a report from the US that America had warned British intelligence two weeks ago of a plot to attack Glasgow airport.

I suppose the Brits are referring to this; I don’t know if the issue is that the warnings came from previously-discredited sources but we didn’t realize that or that we didn’t think it was necessary to share the warnings with the UK “for operational reasons.”

(Here's more from Atrios/Josh Marshall.)

Grasping, Fixated and...Beyond Stupid

Based on today’s fluff piece on Dubya in the Washington Post (noted by BarbinMD of The Daily Kos here), I was inspired to recall this moment from about 10 years ago (manufactured by me, I’ll admit)…

At a difficult moment in his presidency, Bill Clinton is looking for answers.

“He’s a bit perplexed, I believe,” said Vice President Al Gore. “I mean, look, we’ve done all we can to make government more accountable by launching the first official White House web site and making other federal agencies, the U.S. court system and the military develop sites of their own. We’ve also created 11 million new jobs, and we’re doing all we can to help pass McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation. On top of that, we’re on target not only to balance the federal budget, but return a surplus to the treasury.”

“So what is going on? You have The Washington Post running a front-page story of FBI agents and prosecutors working for ‘independent’ counsel Kenneth Starr talking to about 12-15 women he supposedly knew in Arkansas about an alleged extramarital affair, including someone named Paula Jones, and the president has said that he doesn’t recall ever meeting her.”

To an extent, Clinton walks off the criticism. “He does a very good job of keeping out the extreme things in his life,” according to Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. “He’s stubborn. He’s loyal to his philosophy.”

If our corporate media had any standards of decency or fairness, they would have actually published something along the lines of what I concocted above.

Every time I think the punditocracy can’t possibly sink any lower in its efforts to make President Nutball look quasi-legitimate, they manage to do so (really can’t add anything else to what Barbin MD or Lithium Cola said, but only emphasize how transparent the motives are of Dubya’s enablers as circumstances around him spin further and further out of control).

More Gun Cowardice

From last Tuesday's Bucks County Courier Times...

One major newspaper calls the Tiahrt Amendment the Senate's "most pernicious gift to the gun lobby."

The description is right on target for a measure that restricts the access of local law enforcement agencies to vital gun-crime data.

Scheduled to come up for a renewal vote in the Senate Appropriations Committee today, the amendment is the darling of the weapons industry and a favorite of the National Rifle Association.

Kansas Republican Todd Tiahrt introduced the rider to the annual Department of Justice appropriations bill in 2003, arguing that restrictions were necessary to protect the gun industry from nuisance lawsuits by cities such as Philadelphia and New York.

Among its other provisions, the amendment says police and other investigators cannot request information on whether a gun owner has bought other firearms that have been used in a crime.

Several Pennsylvania police chiefs or public safety directors have joined hundreds of their colleagues across the country in criticizing this misguided effort and seeking its repeal.

The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives maintains a database that could help law enforcement agencies develop effective strategies against gun trafficking and illegal guns.

In a letter, the crime fighters argue persuasively that limiting the bureau's ability to disclose this data ties their hands while protecting corrupt gun dealers.

In the post-9/11 era, when sharing information is an imperative and not a luxury, the repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment takes on special urgency. We urge Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, a key player in this issue, to stand against the gun lobby and for law enforcement.

The Courier Times was spot-on, absolutely right here. Unfortunately, Specter chickened out, though he had a lot of company.

(And by the way, to point out what an idiot Tiahrt is, to say nothing of being an NRA shill, here is a link to a post describing his opposition to an HIV needle-exchange program, fighting it on the grounds that, in his opinion, it encourages drug use. I have a feeling, though, that if I dug a bit deeper, I'd probably find that Tiahrt votes in lockstep with the wingnuts regarding their agenda on everything.)

And on top of that, a great big raspberry goes out to Kansas TV station KWCH which refused to air an ad paid for by New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg opposing Tiahrt's amendment that would run in Tiahrt's district, as noted in the Gun Guys post above (all peas in the same unholy pod, apparently).

The Senate Appropriations Committee, as noted here, passed the so-called Shelby Amendment by Dem-turncoat-turned-Repug Richard Shelby that ended up reinstating the Tiahrt Amendment into the Commerce, Justice and Science appropriations bill after it was removed by Dem senator Barbara Mikulski (I guess that sort of slight of hand is how people wearing business attire manage to act like criminals while convincing some people that they're "solid citizens").

And in addition to the usual Repug suspects, the following Dems covered themselves with this muck by supporting Tiahrt-Shelby: Chairman Robert Byrd (D-WV), Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND), Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD), Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA), and Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE).

As the Courier Times so correctly stated, sharing gun-crime data is vital if we're going to defend ourselves against threats of terrorism, to say nothing of trying to save our cities (and to find out about the huge amount of opposition to the Tiahrt Amendment that they noted, click here; the Philadelphia Inquirer is noticeably absent on the list of newspapers running anti-Tiahrt editorials, by the way). Still, though, our politicians caved in fear of the NRA, worrying about attack gun ads from this bunch as well as a loss of campaign funds.

And as far as PA goes, I think the only thing we can say is, "Heckuva job, Arlen."

Update 7/2: Here's more from the New York Times.

Update 7/17: Fair is fair, and I should have pointed out earlier that the Inquirer did write an editorial opposing the Tiahrt Amendment here (registration may be required).

Saturday Videos

The Hold Steady ("Chips Ahoy!" - overdue for this one)...



...Happy belated birthday to drummer Ian Paice of Deep Purple ("Highway Star"; surely an inspiration for Spinal Tap here)...



...Happy Birthday also to Philadelphia's own bass virtuoso Stanley Clarke (performing "My Greatest Hits" with drummer Steve Gadd - love the title)...



..and Happy 90th birthday to the one and only Lena Horne ("How Do You Do" with Grover of "Sesame Street" from 1973 - God bless her).

Friday Videos

The Fiery Furnaces ("Benton Harbor Blues")...



...time to visit the '80s with Martha and the Muffins ("Echo Beach" - hey, it's summer, OK?)...



...and I forgot Patty Smyth of Scandal earlier this week ("Hands Tied")...



...and Happy Birthday to Colin Hay of Men At Work ("It's A Mistake"; I once saw them open for Fleetwood Mac at the Spectrum in '83 I believe before they received saturation airplay on MTV, and no one knew who they were and they received tepid applause and were actually booed - Hay responded by flipping off the audience and ending the band's set after about a half hour. I was mad at the time, but looking back on it, I think it's funny now; also, I just like this song, and I really don't mean this as a message for what started on 3/19/03)...

He's Still The One

I know this is a real "11th hour" kind of thing, but please take a look at this message for John Hall.

And here's more from when he ran for the U.S. Congress from New York last year, getting some help from that Clinton guy.

Two Logical Career Paths

And in world news, it turns out that India is trying to find someone for a new ad campaign aimed at using methods to protect oneself from sexually transmitted diseases (protruding into a new promotion, if you will).

I would like to help out by nominating this person as “Mr. Condom.” I mean, he’s been out of the headlines for a few months, so maybe this will give him something to do (I know there is nothing in his bio denoting Indian ancestry, but is that a "deal-breaker" here?).

And while the Indian government is at it, maybe they could make sure they've covered both sides here and nominate this person as “Ms. Diaphragm.” I’m sure she has time on her hands since she just got out of jail (maybe even the predisposition to do something constructive, or is that too much to ask?), and maybe if she were to relocate halfway around the globe, it would make it harder for her to appear on my tee vee and computer screen every stinking time I turn on either one of them.

Brian’s Stinky Inky Birthday Bash

Has it been only a year since Bruce Toll, Brian Tierney and Philadelphia Media Holdings L.L.C. took over the Philadelphia Inquirer, thus beginning quite possibly the slowest and most deliberate execution of a once-proud newspaper that anyone has ever seen?

Oh, I’m sorry – forgive me; I forgot to note that the newspaper has experienced a whopping daily circulation gain of 0.6 percent this year, thus initiating the paper’s childish “When Pigs Fly” ad campaign (only slightly less infantile than Kevin Ferris’ column today; I confess that I was too busy laughing at it to muster a response - it was such a shameless piece of freeper agit-prop that I'm not even going to link to it).

And this note of self-congratulation from Tierney refers to an unnamed Inky reader who he met on Walnut Street, who of course had good things to say about the new ownership.

Well, if Brian is going to bring the cake, then please allow me to bring the acetylene torch, as it were, to light the candles.

This notes how the Inky has basically sold its business section to Citizens Bank, thus ensuring “fair and balanced” coverage, no doubt (and not really a good sign in a paper that continues to shrink anyway – I’m waiting for the day when the “nation and world” section matches the size of the Express edition).

This notes the complaint (legitimate as far as I’m concerned) by the Philadelphia Association of Black Journalists about the disproportionate number of minorities laid off by Tierney last year, which is particularly bad for a paper that still needs work if it ever hopes to see the day when its newsroom somewhat approximates the demographic makeup of its audience (and I know of no formal reply by Tierney or anyone at Philadelphia Media Holdings to this letter).

And regarding Tierney’s recent ravings that he was trying to put a group together to make a bid for Dow Jones and The Wall Street Journal, I thought this was spot-on…

"I'm tickled pink that Tierney has apparently found a mother lode of money coming from [the two newspapers] and I look forward to him sharing it with his employees," Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky said yesterday. "I look forward to him welcoming back 75 people who lost their jobs because he said he couldn't afford to keep them. I'm looking forward to our pension being restored now that he's got enough money to be throwing at the Wall Street Journal. I'm looking forward to having our sick pay restored now that we know he's so flush."

So Happy Birthday, Brian! Good luck with those Sunday circulation numbers.

Where The Rubber Meets The Road (6/29/07)

As reported in last Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer, here is how Philadelphia-area members of Congress were recorded on major roll-call votes last week.

House

Foreign affairs budget. The House passed, 241-178, and sent to the Senate a $34.2 billion foreign operations budget for fiscal 2008, up 8 percent from 2007.

A yes vote was to pass HR 2764.

Voting yes: Robert E. Andrews (D., N.J.), Robert A. Brady (D., Pa.), Michael N. Castle (R., Del.), Charles W. Dent (R., Pa.), Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.), Jim Gerlach (R., Pa.), Tim Holden (D., Pa.), Frank A. LoBiondo (R., N.J.), Patrick Murphy (D., Pa.), H. James Saxton (R., N.J.), Allyson Schwartz (D., Pa.) and Joe Sestak (D., Pa.).

Voting no: Joseph R. Pitts (R., Pa.) and Christopher H. Smith (R., N.J.).

Iraq study. The House voted, 355-69, to amend HR 2764 (above) to revive the Iraq Study Group, which would conduct a follow-up outside critique of U.S. policies in Iraq.

A yes vote backed the amendment.

Voting yes: Andrews, Brady, Castle, Dent, Gerlach, Holden, LoBiondo, Saxton, Schwartz, Sestak and Smith.

Voting no: Fattah, Murphy and Pitts.

This idea from Repug Rep. Christopher Shays of Connecticut is cruel, stupid, and utterly ridiculous, and here’s why; We’re waaay beyond studying whether or not we should be leaving at this point.

And amazingly enough, Joe Pitts ends up doing the right thing here for a change, though for the wrong reason I’m sure; would that others had followed him, Chaka Fattah and Patrick Murphy.

Contraceptives. Members voted, 223-201, to amend HR 2764 (above) to allow U.S. donations of contraceptives to groups overseas that provide or advocate abortions. The vote made an exception to the government's "Mexico City Policy," which since 1984 has sought to ban all forms of U.S. aid to global family-planning organizations that provide or advocate abortions.

A yes vote backed the amendment.

Voting yes: Andrews, Brady, Castle, Dent, Fattah, Murphy, Schwartz and Sestak.

Voting no: Gerlach, Holden, LoBiondo, Pitts, Saxton and Smith.

Assuming this gets through the Senate, the minute that were to occur, Dubya would grab that veto pen into his hand faster than you can say Pat Robertson.

Senate

Energy. The Senate passed, 65-27, and sent to the House a bill to raise vehicle mileage standards by 40 percent by 2020, cut federal support of fossil-fuel production, promote renewable fuels, punish any price gouging by oil firms, and improve the efficiency of appliances and lights.

All Philadelphia-area senators voted for HR 6.

OPEC lawsuits. The Senate voted, 70-23, to hold OPEC nations answerable under U.S. antitrust law when they limit supplies and fix prices on the world oil market. The vote amended HR 6 (above).

A yes vote backed the amendment.

Voting yes: Thomas Carper (D., Del.), Bob Casey (D., Pa.), Frank Lautenberg (D., N.J.), Robert Menendez (D., N.J.) and Arlen Specter (R., Pa.).

Not voting: Joseph Biden (D., Del.).

Pardon me while I withhold my praise for this, but I’ll cheer when I see legislation like this that is applicable to oil companies that are based or do business in the US of A (and no, I won’t hold my breath waiting for it).

This week, the House debated fiscal 2008 spending bills and possibly energy legislation, while the Senate took up killed bills on union organizing and immigration reform.

Before The Shooting Starts

This Guest Opinion appeared in the Bucks County Courier Times a couple of days ago. It was written by Debbie Wachspress of Lower Makefield, PA, a government affairs consultant and a national leader in the Million Mom March 2000 for common sense guns laws. She is vice president of the board of trustees of Kidsbridge Children’s museum at the College of New Jersey, the mission of which is to teach tolerance and anti-bullying.

Something we know to be true was confirmed on the front page of (The Courier Times) with the headline, “Police say student brought unloaded gun to school.” Kids are bringing guns into our schools. Like it or not, the potential for the next Columbine or Virginia Tech exists everywhere, even in our own back yard. So what should we do?

Some say the solution to prevent guns in our schools is installing metal detectors at the front door. Others promote random bag checks or a prohibition on carrying bags at all. Another contingent advocates patting down our children just before the morning’s Pledge of Allegiance. Most people don’t find any of these options appealing (myself included). I have an alternative.

One very important thing happened on that day at Pennsbury High that was perhaps more valuable than any of these desperate measures: Other students told a teacher about the gun. Speaking up in this situation is difficult. You are angering a classmate with the potential to do you harm. Somebody please give each of these kids a medal and let us hold them up as examples of courage and character.

Something we learned shortly after the Columbine massacre was that the two students who opened fire in the school had talked with other kids about their plans.

There were the most obvious of warning signs and yet not a single teenager in that high school had the wherewithal to tell a teacher. According to government studies, in 81 percent of school shootings, attackers told other students about their plans.

Our schools need to be fostering ongoing discussion about the importance of speaking up, that when one classmate talks about bringing a gun into school or keeping a hit list, speaking up is not snitching, but rather, it is saving lives. It is heroism. And while this conversation is occurring, let’s also make the effort to engage our children in ongoing discussions and role playing about the harmful effects of bullying, using the best school-based programs to foster this.

Ideally, character education is happening around our dining room tables and in the behavior that we model for our kids. When our children enter school, just as important as reading, writing and arithmetic is learning how to treat others with kindness and compassion.

Let us teach our children how not to be silent bystanders but rather to have the courage to come to the aid of a peer who is being bullied. This form of speaking up is just as important as the child who spoke up to the teacher about the presence of a gun.

Though I am running for the Lower Makefield Board of Supervisors and not the school board, I commend district CEO Paul Long for agreeing to meet with me to learn more about the National Speak Up campaign developed by PAX International. The Speak Up program makes a toll-free hotline available to report information about peers bringing guns into school, and in the last five years alone, the hotline has received nearly 20,000 calls. With numbers like that, I am willing to be that more than one school shooting was prevented.

As Deb noted, she, along with Matt Maloney, are running as Democrats for the Lower Makefield Board of Supervisors (click here to learn more).

Also, click here to learn more about PAX International’s Speak Up Program.

The "Choice" In Segregation

As noted here, the Supreme Court basically ripped the heart out of the landmark Brown v. Board of Education ruling yesterday by telling the cities of Louisville and Seattle that they cannot take even “modest” steps, according to the Times, in applying a race-based solution to school desegregation.

I think it’s also important to note the following in this Times editorial…

Chief Justice Roberts, who assured the Senate at his confirmation hearings that he respected precedent, and Brown in particular, eagerly set these precedents aside. The right wing of the court also tossed aside two other principles they claim to hold dear. Their campaign for “federalism,” or scaling back federal power so states and localities have more authority, argued for upholding the Seattle and Louisville, Ky., programs. So did their supposed opposition to “judicial activism.” This decision is the height of activism: federal judges relying on the Constitution to tell elected local officials what to do.

This post by Adam B at The Daily Kos gives us a more detailed look at the typically patronizing, heavy-handed language used by Hangin’ Judge J.R. in this ruling…

Before Brown, schoolchildren were told where they could and could not go to school based on the color of their skin. The school districts in these cases have not carried the heavy burden of demonstrating that we should allow this once again, even for very different reasons. For schools that never segregated on the basis of race, such as Seattle, or that have removed the vestiges of past segregation, such as Jefferson County, the way to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis ... is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.

If Roberts or anyone else in our government seriously believes that we should “stop assigning students on a racial basis” to our schools, then they should immediately disavow school choice programs through the use of vouchers, because, overwhelmingly, these programs favor African-American families.

Please understand, though, that I do not oppose efforts by African American families to seek better education for their children. All I’m saying is that school choice programs are, ultimately, one type of race-based “solution” that, happily for conservatives, provides better education for a relatively small sampling of affected students funded by money siphoned off from funding for public schools, which would provide for a vastly larger pool of students.

As evidence, I present the article from this link, particularly this excerpt (from 2005)…

Two of the country's three publicly funded voucher programs operate in cities that are predominantly Black (Milwaukee and Cleveland). In 2000, a national public opinion poll conducted by the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies (JCPE) found that 57% of African Americans favor public voucher programs, including 74% of African Americans with children in their households (JCPE, 2000). Moreover, market advocates have estimated that African American parents participate in at least 42 privately funded voucher programs throughout the country that target inner-city children (Moe, 1999). Statistics regarding African American students' enrollment in charter schools are more staggering. During the 2000-2001 school year, African American students comprised one-third (33%) of the U.S. charter school population, but only 17% of the U.S. public school population overall (Frankenberg & Lee, 2003).

Both scholarly work and the popular press show that market-based, school-choice reforms appeal to African American parents across the country-parents whose children mostly populate low-performing, urban public schools (Barnes, 1997; Fuller, Elmore, & Orfield, 1996; Miller, 1992; Shokraii, 1996). This fits a pattern of Black parents seeking increased accountability, opportunity, choice, and voice within their children's schools, which they have done since the advent of public schooling (Alien & Jewel, 1995; Anderson, 1988; Levin, 1972; Shujaa, 1992).

And as noted from this link (see “Choice Through Vouchers”)…

Vouchers that parents can use to send their children to private, church-related, or public schools of their choice are an alternative that first received public notice after a 1955 address by economist Milton Friedman. He saw vouchers as a way of providing competition for the public schools. However, vouchers remain controversial because they touch on the line involving separation of church and state and because they are seen as diverting money from the public schools. Since 1991, the PDK/Gallup polls have approached this issue with a question that measures approval of the voucher concept -- "allowing parents and students to choose a private school to attend at public expense" -- without using the politically charged word "vouchers." In considering the results, it is useful to keep in mind that choice, independent of a specific program, is popular with the public.

Findings. The percentage favoring vouchers dropped from 38% a year ago to 36% this year, while opposition grew from 57% to 60%. Support for vouchers started at 24% in 1993, fluctuated up and down for years, and peaked at 46% in 2002. It is now at the mid-Nineties level.

Conclusion VII. Support for vouchers is declining and stands in the mid-30% range.

I would guess that voucher support is declining because many parents in schools deemed as “underperforming” by Every Child Left Behind have come to understand that it is a “rob-Peter-to-pay-Paul” scheme that only assists with a fraction of the cost of sending a child to a participating private school (to say nothing of the issue of a child of another faith, or no formal faith at all, being forced to respect the faith of the school in which he or she attends as part of “school choice”).

It seems to me that Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy, from what I can digest of this (and, like Adam B, I’m still trying to do that), are saying that something like what they would define as “educational need” (something literal and quantitative) is the only basis to them for applying a race-based solution such as that used by Louisville and Seattle. To me, a “choice” program is something literal and quantitative that this court could “wrap its arms around” as opposed to something community based that had already existed in those two cities.

I believe this court wants desegregation, but only on its own narrow terms in accordance with the prescribed Repug, right-wing agenda (which, truth be told, means very little desegregation at all). And they’ve already disregarded “settled” law on other matters, so why should that have stopped them again here (making Roberts, as the Times noted in its editorial, a liar as well as a racist - see his characterization of the Voting Rights Act as noted here).

A Perfect Time To Pile On

Kagro X (here) and BarbinMD (here) of The Daily Kos are all over Bushco's middle-digit-raised-on-high at Congress's subpoena for documents related to the firings in the U.S. Attorneys scandal.

To me (and I'm hardly a lawyer or a constitutional scholar), this sounds like contempt of Congress.

As noted here in this Wikipedia article, this represents a slippery legal slope upon which courts have generally been reluctant to rule. All the same, this is the procedure (as noted in the article)...

Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia[1]; according to the law it is the "duty" of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action.

The criminal offense of "contempt of Congress" sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000. Those penalties are enforced upon conviction, even if the Congress which initiated the contempt citation has expired.

The statutory procedure has generally been used by Congress since 1935. While the law pronounces the "duty" of the U.S. Attorney is to impanel a grand jury for its action on the matter, dispute exists over whether the Congress can properly compel the U.S. Attorney to take this action, as the U.S. Attorney is a member of the Executive Branch who ultimately reports to the President. (The Courts have been reluctant to decide this question, claiming it is a "political question" for resolution by the elected branches of government.)

Also noted in the article is the fact that, of those cited, many have managed to settle in advance of the filing of a contempt charge (though with Bushco, I'll admit that anything is possible).

And the perfect time to strike on this is now, especially with President Nutball all wobbly over his loss (h/t Atrios) on the immigration bill; amazingly to me, I thought he showed some halfway decent judgment on it, but the wingnut "base" sunk it and handed a nice political weapon to the Dems - thanks ever so much.

Helping Out Patrick

This letter appeared in the Bucks County Courier Times this morning...

With all of the political negativity, both national and local, I am writing in praise of Congressman Patrick Murphy and his staff.

My widowed neighbor is about to be evicted from her home of 16 years. She has cancer and is unable to work.

Attempts to collect Social Security disability and benefits from her late husband - somehow she got lost in the system - were unsuccessful. To make matters worse, she was unable to receive her late husband's veterans benefits.

With the help of Congressman Murphy and his staff members, Nancy and Brendan, she is now in touch with the proper agencies that are helping her.

Her future is now looking brighter!

Cynthia Genis
Middletown, PA

And here is another reason to support Patrick (and let's not forget this moment below in particular when he stood tall on the Iraq war - I know the audio/video synch is a bit off, but the points he raises are what matters).



And this leads to the inevitable pitch for a contribution with the end of the quarter coming up (sorry), and you can help out by connecting to the Act Blue link (click his photo in uniform on the home page), or by accessing Murphy08 here.

A Master At Work

This doesn't have anything to do with current events here or abroad or politics, but it has everything to do with guitar legend Richard Thompson and the show with his band last night at the Keswick Theater in Glenside, PA (the review by Sam Adams of the Inquirer follows - trying to start the day with something different)...

Guitarist rocks with big ideas and effortless style
By Sam Adams
For The Inquirer

"How do you do it?" yelled a fan after Richard Thompson unleashed yet another dazzlingly deft guitar solo on the audience of Tuesday's Keswick Theatre show.

"If I told you," Thompson quipped, "then you'd know."

In more worshipful times, Thompson would have been called a guitar god. His technique (which, he joked, he developed via a mail-order course called "1,000 Ways to Play") is both awe-inspiring and seemingly effortless, without an ounce of posturing or swagger. When he plays a solo, which he does often and at length, he keeps his head bowed, intent on moving the song forward rather than turning it into a platform for his prowess.

Unlike most rock-based guitarists, Thompson's solos aren't progressions of small ideas but a handful of large ones. He rarely repeats a figure, tracing sinuous, unpredictable lines that somehow touch ground just as the song comes back to its head. As the massive workout that closed "Hard on Me" built to its tumultuous climax, Thompson seemed to be everywhere at once, bending low notes and plucking out high-pitched flurries as the rhythm section of Michael Jerome (drums) and Taras Prodaniuk (bass) thundered behind him.

At Thompson's right hand was multi-instrumental sideman Pete Zorn, whose crafty choices and tasteful playing brought new life to oft-played chestnuts. Zorn's croaking baritone saxophone added a comic twist to "The Wrong Heartbeat," and as a rhythm guitarist, he seemed to know just when to push Thompson along with a quickened strum or two.

Good as Thompson's band was, though, they were hardly missed when they were offstage for a handful of songs. With only his voice and an acoustic guitar, Thompson evoked the cat-paw strut of a music-hall orchestra on "Al Bowlly's in Heaven." The breathless rush of "1952 Vincent Black Lightning" perfectly mirrored the song's tale of a motorcycle-riding outlaw who lives fast and dies young.

With the band behind him, Thompson castigated mistreating women ("Bad Monkey") and sarcastically glorified male thick-headedness ("Mr. Stupid"). But on his own, he let his guard down, a feat as thrilling as any technical display.

And here he is performing "1952 Vincent Black Lightning" mentioned in the Adams review.



Also, posting may be sporadic today; we'll see.

This Week's Smerky Errata

Even when I agree with him (as I do concerning last Sunday’s column about not moving up the PA primary date next year), Philadelphia’s most notorious Repug lapdog manages to conjure up some truly inane nonsense, such as what he considers to be typical campaign behavior…

(Moving up the primary) won't increase the amount of substantive dialogue or personal interaction with candidates in our state. They'll run ads. They'll give a few speeches in the southeast and in Pittsburgh, before quickly flying on to Illinois, New York and California. The closest we'll all come to getting personal will be the interruption of the dinner hour by a telephone push-poll.

I guess Smerky is relying on the fact that many voters aren’t familiar with push-polling (as well as “robo-calls”); both are truly odious tactics practiced by, among others, Jim Gerlach in his campaign against Lois Murphy last year when Gerlach ran for re-election (successfully, sad to say – no sense calling out the 6th district numbskull voters who supported him and risk taking a shot at the wise ones who didn’t).

If, as a voter, you believe you’ve been victimized by a push-poll or a robo-call, contact the offended campaign as soon as possible and let them know (hint: the offender, more often than not, will be a Repug).

Also, concerning how Smerky votes (harking back to the “glorious” days of “Morning in America” with Ronnie Baby and Poppy Bush), he also brought us these pieces of – wisdom(?)…

I heard both speak. I shook their hands. I looked into their eyes. I watched their mannerisms. In short, I formed opinions about each man based on something other than TV coverage and commercials. Each spent time in the state, with field organizations and campaign headquarters, position papers (pre-Internet), and surrogate speakers advancing their views.

I hope Smerky actually read or familiarized himself with the position papers he mentions (and how funny is it that someone who has a column in the Inquirer doesn’t even mention the importance of newspapers in this process?).

Oh well, at least Smerky didn't say anything about smelling them or contemplating anything more sordid, as noted here.

And last as well as least, I give you this…

But what if all is not determined on Feb. 5 (2008)? What if the GOP remains a horse race between Giuliani and Thompson? Or if Clinton and Obama are still deadlocked come Feb. 6? Perhaps a candidate will pick up a head of steam in February only to have a Muskie meltdown or Dean scream in March.

(Apparently, it isn’t much of a “horse race” at the moment between Giuliani and Thompson in the most important “battleground states” at the moment based on this – silly Repug voters, falling for another slick actor…).

Putting aside the fact that the “Dean Scream” was a manufactured media moment of no significance regarding anything whatsoever, and also putting aside the fact that John Edwards is discounted here, even though he’s leading in Iowa polling at the moment based on this – and who of us remembers the “Muskie Meltdown,” I ask (which was a minor show of emotion over a slanderous article written about his wife – Muskie’s coverage would have been totally sympathetic now), I love Smerky’s implication that this sort of thing only happens to Dems (I mean, Repugs never commit these sort of pratfalls for all the world to see, right?).

God, Smerky is such a tool (pointing this stuff out is a dirty, thankless job, I’ll admit, but somebody has to do it).

Mitt Romney, The “Regrettable” Repug

This Letter To The Editor appeared in The Philadelphia Inquirer a few days ago…

I am pleased that the Massachusetts state legislature defeated an amendment that would have allowed voters to decide whether to ban same-sex marriage. Massachusetts is the only state in which same-sex marriage is legal.

Civil rights issues should never be decided by referendum. Our Constitution guarantees that the will of the majority cannot negate the rights of the minority.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the "separate but equal" doctrine that was long used to subjugate blacks. The court ruled that anything which was "separate" was inherently unequal. If racial civil rights issues had been turned over to individual state vote, black Americans would likely still be using "colored" bathrooms throughout the South.

Yet Massachusetts' former Republican governor, Mitt Romney, who is now a candidate for the party's presidential nomination, called the state legislature's vote "regrettable."

Long-held prejudices die slowly. As the saying goes, "The prejudiced and obstinate man does not so much hold opinions as his opinions hold him."

William A. Stoddart
Wilmington, DE

How true that is; I wish Romney would take a few minutes to read this touching and emotionally wrenching account of Don D. Harryman, a gay man trying live his life as a Mormon, before he casts aspersions on a state he once governed but has now apparently “left behind.”

And this is truly demented; I’ve never in my life heard of anyone doing anything like that to a pet. If Romney thinks this is an acceptable way to treat a dog, an animal that generally travels well, then he must have been raised on Mars.

Update: Speaking of the dog thing, is it too bad of a pun to say that this story has legs?

PA's Toxic Time Bombs

The latest from PA Clean Water Action (the last story on the environment jogged my memory on this one)…

Action Needed to Clean Up Hazardous Sites in Pennsylvania

Abandoned, polluted industrial sites, asbestos-laden reservoirs, TCE in people’s well water… these are real problems Pennsylvanians struggle with everyday. To clean up polluted sites, we need permanent funding for the state’s Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act (HSCA). This is a vital program that is facing total bankruptcy this year. Don’t let this happen! Take action today.

Your Elected Officials in Harrisburg will soon vote on funding for HSCA. A state bill, HB 1206, was introduced that adds a $2.25 tipping fee on all municipal garbage that goes to PA landfills. This funding mechanism would provide HSCA with the support it needs. Also, because PA is the largest importer of trash in the country, nearly 40% of the money for HSCA will come from out of state trash generators. Even if the entire fee was passed on to PA residents, the cost would be a mere $2 per person per year.

Send an e-mail to your State Representative and Senator. Urge them to not only support HB 1206 (which contains the Governor’s proposal), but to advance an amendment so that the $2.25 fee also apply to construction and commercial waste, and all waste that goes to our incinerators.

The vote on this bill will happen any day now. Please act today, and help get PA’s toxic waste sites cleaned up!

To learn more, click here.

A Tragic Tigris Fish Story

Somehow, though, I don’t think anyone will be bragging about it.

As noted here by the Times of London, Imams in Iraq have issued a fatwa on carp caught in the Tigris river. The reason is because the fish is considered unclean now, seeing as how it has to coexist in the river with so many dead bodies.

“I still like to eat fish once a week, but it is not quite the same as before,” said Ali, a regular customer, who stopped by Abu Ayyad’s stall yesterday to select a fish for cooking and then returned later to pick it up for his family’s lunch. “We have only been eating farmed fish for the past year.”

The traditional recipe (masgouf) has been prepared in Baghdad for centuries. In happier times the fishermen would bring their boats up along the banks and prepare brushwood fires. The fish would be cleaned, gutted and cut down the back to form a circle and then grilled upright against an open fire.

Whole families would sit out in the cool of the evening and consume masgouf with bread and salads. To this day masgouf is still prepared by Iraqi exiles, including members of the once-vibrant Jewish community, who were forced out of the country half a century ago.

But, like in so many parts of modern Iraq, the conflict has destroyed the old traditions. The once-popular stretch of river, known as Abu Nawas, where masgouf restaurants were open late into the night is a no-go area these days for vehicles and most pedestrians.

I’m sure Dick Cheney is cracking another crooked smile over this one, seeing that he has helped inflict such damage on marine life both here and halfway around the world.

You Had Eight Years, Rudy

“America’s Mayor” really does make this job too easy at times (re: his blaming of Bill Clinton here for “not responding forcefully enough” to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and later terrorist attacks).

Let’s start with the information from this link, which notes that, after the 1993 attack, Rudy decided to put the Emergency Command Center in Building 7 (the one that pancaked even though it wasn’t hit by anything – hmmm…) because he considered it too much to travel to a more secure location in Brooklyn. Also noted is the fact that he didn’t put into place a clear chain of command for emergency workers after 1993, and did not implement a single measure recommended by the fire department, which identified crucial emergency response failures.

Also, this comprehensive post by davefromqueens via The Daily Kos documents these failures and many others by Giuliani prior to 9/11 and subsequent to that awful day (as well as the CIA’s rueful admission that it had trained the 1993 WTC bombers here – hat tip to the blogger My Three Cents for these two links).

And what of the response of Bill Clinton? Well, as noted here…

In all, ten militant Islamist conspirators – including Ramzi Yousef (the person chiefly responsible for the attack) – were convicted for their part in the bombing and were given prison sentences of a maximum of 240 years each.

I realize Clinton doesn’t deserve credit exclusively for that, but this did take place under his watch (and we’re all still waiting for additional convictions for the 9/11 attacks besides the one against Mounir el Motassadeq noted here).

Also, cruise missile attacks were ordered by Clinton at terrorist bases in the Sudan and Afghanistan in response to the U.S. Embassy bombings in 1998. Of the 21 terrorists convicted in the bombings, two were killed, four are serving life without parole, and two are being held at Guantanamo; the rest are being held in the U.K. or are still at large.

In addition, Clinton provided this explanation for the missile attacks in this interview in which he clashed with Fox’s Chris Wallace: “The entire military was against sending special forces into Afghanistan and refueling by helicopter and no one thought we could do it otherwise…We could not get the CIA and the FBI to certify that Al Qaeda was responsible while I was President.” And the investigation into the October 2000 bombing of the U.S.S. Cole could not be completed before the end of Clinton’s term in office.

So to sum up, Rudy, your nonsensical blame game may play with a gaggle of right-wing zombies at Regent University, Pat Robertson’s conservative “Christian” college, but it deflates pretty quickly when held up to scrutiny in blue state territory (though I admit that Rockville, MD is approximately on the geographic and ideological border line).

The C-O-N of the O-S-P

In this speech before students designated as 2007 Presidential Scholars on Monday (one which was ripe with his idiotic attempts at humor, making jokes about his lack of education which, sadly, are thoroughly grounded in reality), Dubya reminded everyone about the following…

We did something else interesting, and I look forward to working with Congress on this -- and I must confess, it's slightly controversial -- and that is, is that we promoted the first federally funded Opportunity Scholarship Program here in Washington, D.C. It basically said to low-income parents that here's some money to help you send your child to a private school or a parochial school, your choice. In other words, it said, if you're tired of being in a system that simply hasn't met expectations, that there ought to be something different, and that I believe that -- I think it's the role of government to help low-income parents have different options.

The program is working. It's over-subscribed. I mean, there are thousands of families that have been helped through this Washington, D.C. program, which ought to say to policymakers, there's a huge demand for something better. People are sick of mediocrity in the status quo. Obviously, it hasn't happened with these kids, for which we're grateful. But there's still too many schools that just aren't meeting expectations. And so I look forward to working to see if we can't expand this kind of program.

“Thousands,” Dubya? Try 1,800 enrolled in non-public schools through the OSP for the 2006-2007 school year (noted here), which, if not over at this point, must be winding to a close.

Also (as noted here)…

(An) evaluation (by the Manhattan Institute) finds that the OSP had no academic effect, positive or negative, on the District's public schools after its first year. Other studies tend to indicate school choice programs have helped to improve public school performance.

As noted here, the OSP was initiated as part of the D.C. School Choice Incentive Act passed by Congress in 2003; this five-year pilot program was part of the omnibus spending bill passed in 2004 and became the first voucher program to be overseen by the U.S. Department of Education.

I know there are families that have been helped by the OSP, but the fact is that we’re talking about 1,800 students out of a school district of approximately 70,000, as noted in the Georgetown study.

And state OSP programs have run into legal challenges, such as the one noted here in Florida. This is because when all is said and done and we’ve dispensed with the shiny, happy rhetoric, OSPs are voucher/school choice programs whose stated goal is to encourage all students in this country to attend private schools and, in the process, let our public schools wither on the vine, so to speak, and die.

And if you want proof regarding what I just said, all you have to do is wade through this comprehensive report assembled by George Miller, senior Democrat on the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce. You could spend all day reading about how this administration has short changed education in this country.

As for the scholars Dubya met with on Monday, kudos in particular to Mari Oye of Wellesley, Massachusetts who, according to MoDo in her Times Select column here today, “slipped him a handwritten letter pleading with him not to let America become known for torture and urging him to stick to the Geneva Conventions with terror detainees” (and kudos also to all 50 students who signed the letter - and speaking of opposing torture, please give this a look).

Tuesday Videos

Fooling April (a Philly-area band performing "C-4" in this brief clip, though I don't know who is introducing them here - definitely looking for more from them since they rock out loud; heard a song tonight called "Breaking The Skin" that was terrific)...



...Happy Birthday to Chris Isaak ("Wicked Game," the nearest I've ever seen to a Calvin Klein ad in a music video; pardon me while I now go out and smoke a cigarette after watching this)...



...also, 30 years ago, the man who no doubt inspired Isaak and countless others gave his last concert performance, and that would be Elvis of course; here he is performing "In The Ghetto" in 1970...



...and in light of the recent garbage from Ann Coulter against John Edwards (based on her purposeful misrepresentation of what Bill Maher supposedly said about Deadeye Dick), I now present Henry Rollins and his "love letter" to her, complete with bad words.

Good Intentions Paving The Road To Hell

I was alerted to this in The Inquirer yesterday; it seems that there are a group of Philadelphia Democratic voters who, instead of casting their ballots for individuals of their own party, may decide to support Philadelphia Repug David Oh for an at-large seat on Philadelphia’s City Council in the November election.

I freely admit that there are probably many other people who know more about Philadelphia politics than I do, but here is what I’ve been able to figure out; there are seven seats in play for the election, and the Democrats traditionally hold onto five (that is the number voters are allowed), with the other two held at the moment by Republicans Frank Rizzo, Jr. (a good guy, I must admit) and Jack Kelly.

Some Democratic voters, as noted in MrLuigi’s post at Young Philly Politics, are tempted to vote for Oh and elect him to try and give Kelly the boot. This would mean voting for four Dems and one Repug; even though the Dems will still hold the majority, this is sending a bad message as far as I’m concerned.

To me, a Repug is a Repug is a Repug; when push comes to shove, they will take their marching orders from Washington (Dems are guilty of this mentality too a bit, but trying to get them to line up in this way is highly problematic – that’s a bad thing nationally as far as I’m concerned, but a good thing locally).

I think W. Wilson Goode, Jr. is right; if Oh has positions that are somewhat progressive (respect on diversity including the Log Cabin Republicans), that’s good. However, if he were really serious about trying to advance these issues on behalf of a party that would actually listen to him, he would have run as a Dem (as Goode wondered in the comments).

As it is, he’s a Repug. Let him fend for himself. If he can’t, then (metaphorically speaking) let him dangle from a yardarm as food for the buzzards.

Update: The following doesn’t pertain to the November Philadelphia election, but it sure as hell pertains to the Republican party; if you thought I was uncharitable before, then in the words of that shallow but revered Repug president, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Do me a favor; read this post, print it, stick it on a wall where you live so you’ll see it every stinking day until November 2008, and never forget who killed the Employee Free Choice Act!

More Inky “Glass Half Empty” Time

Last week, in response to the MSNBC story I cited here about journalists making campaign contributions, I wondered what the policy of The Philadelphia Inquirer was on this subject.

Well, the paper answered that question today in their own editorial on the subject (and the paper was in full harrumph, nanny-time-finger-shaking mode over the matter)…

Critics who claim a liberal bias in the "mainstream" media won't be surprised at the partisan divide among the campaign contributors: they overwhelmingly favored Democrats and liberal organizations.

The percentage of journalists who crossed this line is small, considering there are more than 50,000 newsroom employees working for daily newspapers alone in the United States.

Still, these findings are as troubling as the revelation that some among the "new" online media were paid by political candidates whom they were promoting. (Such financial arrangements often were not disclosed to the audience.)

…

...readers and viewers have no special reason to expect journalistic neutrality; the proof for them must be borne out in fair news coverage, day in and day out. The MSNBC investigation shows journalists must try harder to give audiences that assurance.

Don’t you love the innuendo of guilt here? Journalists who are allowed by their news organizations to exercise their rights as citizens are perceived by the Inky as “crossing a line,” presumably because they supported traditionally Democratic causes (and how funny is it for the Inky to point out “financial arrangements often not disclosed to an audience” when they perpetrate a monstrosity such as this?).

And to answer my original question about the Inky's policy, here is editor Bill Marimow…

"…newsroom policy "prohibits making contributions of money or time to political candidates. That's an ironclad rule."

Fair enough. But here once more is New Yorker editor David Remnick on this subject…

"Our writers are citizens, and they're free to do what they want to do," said (Remnick), who has 10 political donors at his magazine. "If what they write is fair, and they respond to editing and counter-arguments with an open mind, that to me is the way we work."

That’s good enough for me.

"Obfuscating" At Ground Zero

(That word, used in a completely correct manner as far as I’m concerned, was spoken by Dem Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, Ellison being Glenn Beck’s favorite congressman, of course – and why is Beck’s show still on the air anyway?).

So Christie Todd Whitman, former head of the EPA at the time of the 9/11 attacks, testified before a congressional hearing yesterday that the air around the fallen World Trade Center was safe to breathe.

I wish Dem Rep. Jerrold Nadler’s committee had called Thomas Cahill to testify either prior to Whitman’s appearance or possibly concurrent with hers, since, as noted in this prior post, Cahill, a professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric science, had called the conditions for people working at ground zero without respirators “brutal” (here is more)…

“The site was hot for months. The metals burned into fine particles. They rose in a plume and moved over people’s heads on most days. There were at least eight days when the plume was pushed down into the city. Then people tasted it, smelled it and saw it. But people who worked in the pile (of rubble) were getting it every day.”

Cahill’s data found that the pollution included very fine metals, which interfere with lung chemistry; sulfuric acid, which attacks lung cells; carcinogenic organic matter; and very fine insoluble particles such as glass, which travel through the lungs and into the bloodstream and heart.

…

Cahill’s comments echo a report issued in August (2003) by the EPA inspector general, an internal watchdog on the agency. The inspector general concluded that under White House influence, the EPA issued misleading assurances that there was no health risk from air pollution after the attack.

…

“Christie Whitman was too premature to say it was safe,” Cahill said Tuesday. “I think the EPA should have known. The EPA had its own reports saying it could be dangerous. Why didn’t the EPA bring in their own people from all over the country? They could have. Never thought of it. They did later. But not in the time that mattered.”

And it’s not as if Whitman hadn’t caved on environmental safety because of a conflict of interest before; as noted here, former National EPA Ombudsman Robert Martin complained about Whitman’s foot dragging on the cleanup of the Shattuck and Marjol hazardous waste sites.

Perhaps this was the reason why…

Citigroup owns Shattuck. Citigroup's venture capital company co-owns AMI Semiconductor with GA-TEK Inc., the parent company of Gould Electronics, Marjol's owner. Mrs. Whitman's husband John owns stock valued at between $100,001 and $250,000, according to Mrs. Whitman's financial disclosure reports. He also works for a venture capital company backed by Citigroup.

And Martin was rewarded for this public service by having his ombudsman office reassigned under the EPA inspector general by Whitman, which meant, among other things, that Martin was no longer able to supervise, hire and fire his own staff (including chief inspector Hugh Kaufman, who sought reinstatement).

It would be nice if Whitman showed an ounce of courage here and returned the favor to the people who sold her out (referring of course to the individuals at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue). Why anyone would still show allegiance to this cabal of crooks is something that defies sanity as far as I’m concerned.

Money Over Humanitarianism

TIME Magazine gushed over Bill and Melinda Gates in 2006, naming them Persons Of The Year along with Bono of U2 in part for providing $750 million for child immunizations, awarding grants to schools in Texas, Colorado and Massachusetts, and sponsoring the Lutheran World Relief program, which received $640,000 to help nomadic communities in Niger avert food crises.

What a tragedy that Gates doesn’t have a similar humanitarian instinct when it comes to American workers.

As noted here in yesterday’s New York Times, Gates and Steven A. Ballmer of Microsoft (the company Gates founded, of course), as well as other executives, lobbied Congress to loosen H-1B visa restrictions to allow more foreign workers to enter this country under the traditional cry by employers that there is a shortage of American workers (author Linda Musthaler in her column here uses a more polite “B” word than the one I would use in response to that claim).

Actually, if Gates had his way, he would eliminate the H-1B visa program altogether (as noted here). Gee, I guess Bill doesn't see the homeland security issue there, does he?

Here is yet another column about the pain inflicted on workers who are victimized by outsourcing/offshoring/whatever corporate trend is favored this week when it comes to screwing over U.S. workers (and Bob Cesca of HuffPo notes here about the hypocrisy of individuals like Sen. Charles Grassley who profess to support American workers but have, in fact, voted for every “free” trade bill that has come across his path).

And by the way, Bill, if you still have a shred of a good instinct remaining towards your fellow man, you might want to take a look at the case of Waskar Ari Chachaki (noted here), a visiting professor from Bolivia who last taught at the University of Nebraska but who has been denied a visa to reenter this country. His students would greatly benefit from his ability and perspective on a foreign culture (though we’re only talking about humanities here and not computer science as far as you’re concerned, so I guess I’m supposed to understand why you wouldn’t care).

Fighting Freeper Slime

The latest from Joe Trippi of the John Edwards for President Campaign (once again, sorry to "put the bite" on everyone like this)...

Yesterday, Jonathan told you that the folks who benefit from the status quo are attacking John personally because they don't want the country to hear his message.

And you know what happened when we called them out? The attacks started pouring in.

That same day, the Ann Coulter-wannabe Michelle Malkin blasted John on her blog. Fox News has been bashing him around the clock. And Coulter herself said, "if I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."

Typical (and don't hold your breath waiting for any of her foul peers to call her on this, of course).

We are fighting back, but we need your help. Give what you can today.

Click here.

They are trying to put John away before he even gets started. Because they know what we know. They know that John has led on Iraq. That he has lead on universal health care. That he has led on global warming, on poverty, and on building One America.

And they are seeing what we're seeing—poll after poll showing John outperforming all other Democrats against all Republicans. In the latest poll from Rasmussen Reports, John is the only Democrat to beat Giuliani, McCain, Romney and Fred Thompson—and by an average of 13 points!

If you're a right-wing wing-nut, this is the scariest thing you can imagine—that the Democratic candidate with the boldest vision for America is also the most electable.

So they will stop at nothing to tear John down. We can stop them—but only if you stand up. We have 5 more days to reach our goal of $9 million. Give what you can today, and help us beat back this vicious tide.

Click here.

We are counting on you—because we are not counting on corporate interests and D.C. lobbyists. John is the only candidate with a proven record of taking on corporate interests. He is the only candidate who hasn't taken a dime from D.C. lobbyists or political action committees. He hasn't sold out, and he hasn't forgotten where he came from.

But that means we need you to reach our goal. You, and the hundreds of thousands of other supporters on this list. If we all give today, we can turn our small change into big change—big change for America and the world.

Click here.

With your help, we will keep pushing John's message in the critical early primary states. Today, we are launching a new TV spot in New Hampshire. People all across the state will hear John's message: if you want big change on poverty, global warming, health care, Iraq—if you want big change on all the issues that matter most, then join our cause.

We need to hit our goal of $9 million by Saturday to keep this ad on the air and continue reaching voters in New Hampshire, Iowa, and other key states nationwide. To see the ad, to help us hit that goal, and to keep the wing-nuts shaking in their boots, please give what you can afford today.

Click here.

Your time is now—and we are counting on you.

Sincerely,

Joe Trippi
John Edwards for President
June 26, 2007

To learn more, click here.

Monday Videos

Bad Religion ("Honest Goodbye" - hat tip to kos for this one)...



...Happy Birthday to Ian McDonald of Foreigner and King Crimson ("Heart Turns To Stone" by the former group; a little early in the week to journey to the '80s, I know - I also know McDonald had left by this point, but I like this song, so...)...



...Happy Birthday also to Tim Finn of Split Enz and Crowded House ("I Got You" from the former band again, going to the '80s well once more; introduced by show biz hanger-on Jack Burns on "Fridays" - the comedy was hit and miss, but they certainly knew good, interesting camera work when it came to the music acts)...



...and Happy Birthday to Carly Simon ("Mockingbird" with J.T. from back in the '70s - I have a feeling this was the No Nukes concert, but there's no further info on this video so I can't confirm it).