Friday, August 08, 2008

Where The Rubber Meets The Road (8/8/08)

As reported in last Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer, here is how Philadelphia-area members of Congress were recorded on major roll-call votes last week.

Federal tobacco regulation. In a 326-102 vote, the House sent the Senate a bill that would begin Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco products. The bill would empower the FDA to regulate cigarette content, require disclosure of product ingredients, ban cigarette marketing to children, and require more prominent health warnings.

A yes vote was to pass the bill (HR 1108).

Voting yes: Robert E. Andrews (D., N.J.), Robert A. Brady (D., Pa.), Michael N. Castle (R., Del.), Charles W. Dent (R., Pa.) Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.), Jim Gerlach (R., Pa.), Tim Holden (D., Pa.), Frank A. LoBiondo (R., N.J.), Patrick Murphy (D., Pa.), H. James Saxton (R., N.J.), Allyson Y. Schwartz (D., Pa.), Joe Sestak (D., Pa.), and Christopher H. Smith (R., N.J.).

Voting no: Joseph R. Pitts (R., Pa.).
I make a lot of fun of Joe Pitts and his awful votes, but in all seriousness, this is utterly unconscionable (to support Bruce Slater, please click here – if this isn’t a reason to do so, I don’t know what is).

Oil-market speculation. In a 276-151 vote, the House failed to reach a two-thirds majority needed to pass a bill directing the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to curb "excessive speculation" in the oil-futures market, in part by setting higher margin requirements, limiting investment positions, and requiring more public disclosure.

A yes vote was to advance the bill (HR 6604).

Voting yes: Andrews, Brady, Castle, Dent, Fattah, Gerlach, Holden, LoBiondo, Murphy, Schwartz, Sestak and Smith.

Voting no: Pitts and Saxton.
So Pitts and Saxton think they know more than Nomi Prins, a former managing director of Goldman Sachs who thinks we must do a hell of a lot more than we’re doing to regulate oil speculation (noted here)?

How interesting.

Gender-based pay bias. In a 247-178 vote, the House sent the Senate a bill to bolster the federal law that bans pay discrimination based on gender. The bill would empower women alleging pay bias to sue for recovery of back pay and receive punitive and compensatory damages, ban employer retaliation against those who share salary data with coworkers, and establish a grant program to teach negotiating skills to girls and women.

A yes vote was to pass the bill (HR 1338).

Voting yes: Andrews, Brady, Castle, Dent, Fattah, Gerlach, Holden, Murphy, Schwartz, Sestak and Smith.

Voting no: LoBiondo, Pitts and Saxton.
I actually just went looking for more information on Pitts (along with LoBiondo – Saxton is a hopeless case also who can’t leave soon enough at this point), and I found out that Pancake Joe is scheduled to host a public meeting to discuss the proposed Sparrows Point Pipeline Project this Tuesday at 7 PM at the Octorara High School Auditorium, 226 Highland Road, Atglen (for any PA-16 folk who may be reading this).

Why don’t you show up and give Joe a piece of your mind over this and other matters? It can only help (when it comes to adding to whatever gray matter Joe actually has, I mean). I’d like to hear him try to explain why he thinks gender-based pay discrimination if OK.

Senate

Renewable-energy tax credits. In a 51-43 vote, the Senate failed to reach 60 votes needed to end GOP blockage of a bill to extend renewable-energy tax credits due to expire at year's end. The credits would promote fuel extraction from sources such as the sun, wind, earth and crops and promote the manufacture of more energy-efficient homes, buildings and appliances.

A yes vote was to advance the bill (S 3335).

Voting yes: Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D., Del.), Thomas Carper (D., Del.), Bob Casey (D., Pa.), Robert Menendez (D., N.J.), and Frank Lautenberg (D., N.J.).

Voting no: Arlen Specter (R., Pa.).
Gee, didn’t Arlen just get done criticizing Congress for supposedly not doing anything on this issue here? Well, it sounds like they were trying, but the “Roadblock Republicans” struck again, with “Senator Comcast” going along for the ride.

As always, screw you, Arlen.

Higher Education Act. In an 83-8 vote, the Senate sent President Bush the conference report on a bill (HR 4137) renewing the Higher Education Act at a cost of at least $142 billion in discretionary spending through fiscal 2013. The bill would provide up to $10,000 in student-loan forgiveness to members of the armed forces, public defenders, prosecutors, firefighters, emergency workers, law enforcement officers, educators, and nurses.

A yes vote was to approve the measure.

Voting yes: Biden, Carper, Casey, Menendez, Lautenberg and Specter.
As you can read here, I thought the voting on this was pretty interesting.

Repug Olympia Snowe of Maine voted “present.” Does she support helping out all of these fine professionals with their student loans, or doesn’t she?

John McCain did not cast a vote (yes, I know there’s a good reason, but this is in keeping with his horrific attendance). Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton likewise did not vote. Neither did Norm Coleman (take note, Al), Dems Amy Klobuchar and Ted Kennedy (for an obvious reason), and Repugs Chuck Hagel and Pete Domenici.

And the No votes, as you might expect, were all from Repugs trying to recover some conservative “brand” of miserly spending on the backs of people who don’t deserve it, and they would be Jeff Sessions, Jon Kyl, John Isakson, Tom Coburn, Jim Inhofe (to help Andrew Rice, click here), Jim DeMint, Lamar Alexander, and Bob Corker.

And as of now, Congress is in recess until the week of Sept. 8.

2 comments:

Not-A-Blogger said...

Pitts' meeting on proposed Sparrows Point Pipeline Project was a joke - more like a public relations stunt!
Pitts' press release stated the purpose of this meeting was "to provide a voice for those individuals who may be affected by the proposed pipeline to ask questions and share their concerns with both the company proposing the project and the federal regulators who will need to sign off on the project in order for it to move forward . . . ."
Well, that sounds like it is moving forward whether or not there is any local concern about safety, or damage to historical buildings or the environment or this area's cultural resources. But what really had me scratching my head was why there was no one making a record of the meeting. No one was recording the statements and concerns of the dozens of persons who spoke. A few notes may have been taken, but how can anyone be assured their concerns will indeed be considered by either the corporate applicants (who admitted this is a for-profit venture) and/or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission?
I did catch up with one of the FERC guests after the "meeting" and asked why there was no record being kept. His response: we've heard all this before over the past 2 years; anyone having concerns can mail them in if they want their concerns considered on the record.
What a sham! Obviously, this was more of a PR stunt for an incumbent who thinks he needs visibility.
Pitts was visible, but he expressed no concern whatsoever for any of the comments made by any of his constituents.
Disclaimer: I am an active supporter of BRUCE SLATER, who is seriously challenging Mr. Pitts for the Congressional seat representing the 16th Congressional District (all of Lancaster County and portions of Chester and Berks Counties.)
Gregory Paulson, Attorney
Lancaster, PA

doomsy said...

Sounds like "par for the course" with Pancake Joe, which is apparently the way some of his goonish sycophants want it - I have to believe that the voters of the 16th district deserve someone infinitely better, like Bruce Slater.