Saturday Stuff

What a shame - it's about 7:30 EST and it looks like I missed The Rapture :-)...

Anyway, a hat tip to Avedon Carol at Eschaton for this (it's the real thing)...



...and here is another video clip of a town hall event that you won't see from the news programs on networks with initials for names (and this addresses the Buerkle lie about the $500 billion - I cannot imagine how these people sleep at night, and hopefully I never will)...



...and here is another one (paging Alan Grayson - this Webster putz ought to read this...oh, sorry, I forgot; the Repugs have their hands over their ears and eyes closed I guess, yelling "NYAAAH, NYAAAH, CAN'T HEAR YOU")...



...and I realize that my musical selections have been stuck in a bit of a time warp, which isn't too bad I know, but here is something more current.

Friday Stuff

About what I said earlier, I didn't mean to imply that the Dems don't have more work to do on behalf of organized labor (here)...



...and I would say that this bears repeating based on this (and this...and I'm sure Repug Bucks County, PA DA David Heckler will release the results of his investigation into the Ciervo/Fitzpatrick voter fraud letter from last November any day now...any day now)...



...also, "What's Going On?," an album Berry Gordy definitely didn't want Marvin Gaye to release (until it started making money, that is), made its debut forty years ago (ugh) today...



...and finally...well, it looks like all good things must come to an end based on this, so I guess it's time for us to all find our biospheres or whatever and climb in, take one last big swig of that Kool Aid if you will, and call it a day - see you on the other side :-).

Friday Mashup (5/20/11)

On the subject of “disrespect” (and clownhall.com isn’t ripping “Bibi” here, of course), it should be noted that President Obama is being attacked by the usual suspects even though his call for Israel to return to its 1967 borders was also articulated by Former President Highest Disapproval Rating IN Gallup Poll History, as well as “The Big Dog,” as noted here.

And here is another item for the “disrespect” file, concerning the nomination of Goodwin Liu to the U.S. Federal Appeals Court.

Also, here is yet another item, and a response is here (impudent and naughty to call out my “A” list brethren I know, but I’ll be honest; sometimes I get a little tired of the whining from our side too…besides, I think the speech by Richard Trumka linked to by Atrios is more of a response to this, which I’ll admit is inexcusable).

Next, I give you the Area Votes in Congress writeup from last Sunday’s Philadelphia Inquirer (here)…

House

Gulf of Mexico drilling. Voting 263-163, the House sent the Senate a bill (H.R. 1229) that would restore oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico to levels comparable to those in effect before last year's BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The bill would require the Interior Department to act within 60 days on about 40 permit applications now undergoing safety and environmental reviews. The administration lifted its post-spill drilling moratorium in October, and has since issued about 10 deepwater permits and nearly 40 permits for drilling in shallow water.

A yes vote was to pass the bill.

Voting yes: Charles W. Dent (R., Pa.), Michael Fitzpatrick (R., Pa.), Jim Gerlach (R., Pa.), Tim Holden (D., Pa.), Frank A. LoBiondo (R., N.J.), Pat Meehan (R., Pa.), Joseph R. Pitts (R., Pa.), Jon Runyan (R., N.J.), and Christopher H. Smith (R., N.J.).

Voting no: Robert E. Andrews (D., N.J.), Robert A. Brady (D., Pa.), John Carney (D., Del.), Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.), and Allyson Y. Schwartz (D., Pa.).

Blowout prevention. Voting 176-237, the House defeated a bid to expand H.R. 1229 (above) to include safety recommendations issued in January by the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. The amendment would have required the enactment of minimum standards in areas such as preventing blowouts, cementing wells, and installing redundant safety barriers inside wells - steps that would be subject to independent, third-party certifications. Though the commission's recommendations have been addressed to varying degrees by governmental regulators and the oil industry, they have not been added to federal law.

A yes vote backed the amendment.

Voting yes: Andrews, Brady, Carney, Dent, Fattah, Fitzpatrick, LoBiondo, Schwartz, and Smith.

Voting no: Holden, Gerlach, Meehan, Pitts, and Runyan.

Hmmm…I smell another "safe" Yes vote that Mikey The Beloved can tout (along with Dent, LoBiondo and Smith) as part of his supposed environmental bona fides which, in fact, don’t exist, particularly since the bill was doomed to fail anyway, probably because it made too much sense for the bunch in power here.

Outer continental shelf oil. Voting 243-179, the House authorized oil and gas exploration in several expanses of the outer continental shelf where drilling is now banned for primarily environmental reasons. In part, the bill (H.R. 1231) would require the Department of the Interior to sell leases for drilling off the Atlantic Coast from Maine to North Carolina, in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, off southern California, in the Arctic Ocean, and off Alaska's Bristol Bay. Depending on the state, the outer continental shelf usually begins three to nine nautical miles from shore and reaches outward for at least 200 nautical miles.

A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.

Voting yes: Dent, Fitzpatrick, Gerlach, Holden, Meehan, and Pitts.

Voting no: Andrews, Brady, Carney, Fattah, LoBiondo, Runyan, Smith, and Schwartz.

Ban on oil exports. Voting 180-243, the House defeated a Democratic motion to H.R. 1231 (above) to prohibit energy companies from selling abroad the outer continental shelf oil and natural gas they extract under federal leases. The measure also would have required the Department of the Interior, over the next five years, to reduce by half the large number of nonperforming oil and gas leases in the outer continental shelf.

A yes vote backed the motion.

Voting yes: Andrews, Brady, Carney, Fattah, Holden, and Schwartz.

Voting no: Gerlach, Fitzpatrick, LoBiondo, Meehan, Pitts, Runyan, and Smith.

Not voting: Dent.

Sooo…while the Repugs and their minions scream “drill, baby, drill,” nobody is supposed to ask where the product of that effort is supposed to go, are they? We can’t tell Big Oil not to sell that “black crude” offshore if those markets are more favorable than ours, can we?

Sometimes I think the Republicans must read about votes like this and laugh their asses off. And when it comes to the stupidity of the voters who returned them to power last November, they should.

2011 intelligence budget. Voting 392-15, the House passed a classified U.S. intelligence budget (H.R. 754) estimated at $55 billion or more for fiscal 2011. The bill would fund operations of civilian and military spy agencies such as the CIA, National Security Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, and National Reconnaissance Office. When other outlays in the federal budget are counted, total spending for intelligence activities is projected to top $80 billion this year.

A yes vote was to pass the bill.

Voting yes: Andrews, Carney, Dent, Fattah, Fitzpatrick, Gerlach, Holden, LoBiondo, Meehan, Pitts, Runyan, Schwartz, and Smith.

Not voting: Brady.

Senate

Judge Edward Chen. Voting 56-42, the Senate confirmed the nomination of Edward M. Chen as a federal judge for the Northern District of California. Chen, 58, has been a federal magistrate judge in San Francisco for 10 years, and before that he was an American Civil Liberties Union staff lawyer. Senate Republicans stalled the nomination for 21 months over concerns that Chen would be an "activist judge," while Democrats noted that Chen received the American Bar Association's highest rating for a judicial nominee.

A yes vote was to confirm Chen.

Voting yes: Thomas Carper (D., Del.), Bob Casey (D., Pa.), Chris Coons (D., Del.), Frank Lautenberg (D., N.J.), and Robert Menendez (D., N.J.).

Voting no: Pat Toomey (R., Pa.).

Toomey had to pull at least one stupid and/or irritating stunt last week to fulfill his quota, and I guess this was it.

This week, the House was in recess, and the Senate voted on judicial nominations and took up a bill to rescind billions of dollars in oil-industry tax breaks.

Continuing, I give you a tale of two presidents, sort of – to begin, John Lott whines as follows here…

Wasn't the world supposed to end on Monday? No, I'm not talking about May 21. But on Monday, the U.S. government officially hit its debt limit, but where are disasters that the Obama administration has been predicting for months? We were warned that hitting the debt limit would be "deeply irresponsible" or “insanity” or “abrupt contraction would likely push us into a double dip recession.” But Americans woke up today to find nothing really changed from last week.

The Obama administration’s scare tactics are getting old. Unfortunately, they keep on getting away with this and aren’t held accountable when their scare stories prove false.

If Lott doesn’t want to believe Number 44…well then, would he believe the words of Number 40 (here)?

In 1983, Reagan warned that the consequences of failing to raise the nation’s borrowing limit “are impossible to predict and awesome to contemplate”:

The full consequences of a default — or even the serious prospect of default — by the United States are impossible to predict and awesome to contemplate. Denigration of the full faith and credit of the United States would have substantial effects on the domestic financial markets and the value of the dollar in exchange markets. The Nation can ill afford to allow such a result. The risks, the costs, the disruptions, and the incalculable damage lead me to but one conclusion: the Senate must pass this legislation before the Congress adjourns.

In a 1987 radio address, Reagan also said, “Congress consistently brings the government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. This brinksmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on Social Security and veterans benefits. Interest rates would skyrocket, instability would occur in financial markets, and the Federal deficit would soar.”

Also, Reagan was invoked here in an Op-Ed claiming that the Repugs need to find an “heir” to none other than Calvin Coolidge (our 30th president…paying tribute using multiples of 10, I see).

In response, the following should be considered about “Silent Cal” from here…

…a more important question to ask is whether the prosperity of the 1920's was experienced by all. In fact it was not. According to the Brookings Institution during the Coolidge era the top 0.1% (not 1% but 0.1%) of the population earned as much as the bottom 42%. While the top 0.1% was able to save at a clip of 34% another 80% of Americans had no extra money to put into savings. The rich were certainly experiencing prosperity but most Americans did not experience the benefits of Coolidge's tax policy.

In addition many historians blame Coolidge's economic policy as one of the primary causes of the Great Depression. When the rich got richer through Coolidge's policies they ended up saving the money rather than putting it back into the market as can be seen above. Most Americans did not have the income to purchase "luxury" items like a car or radio which led to many to buy such items on credit. By the end of the 1920's 60% of cars and 80% of radios were bought on credit. Finally Coolidge generally supported a laissez-faire policy which allowed businesses to grow bigger, stocks to be bought on margin, and consumers to be exploited with shady sales practices. All of these policies helped to later create a perfect storm which brought about the Great Depression.

Actually, given the fact that we’re currently living in the gilded age on steroids (as at least one pundit has put it), maybe the comparison to Coolidge is more apt than Washington Times editorialist Garland S. Tucker III realizes (not easy for me to beat up on a Vermonter and otherwise solid citizen like Coolidge, but as another president once said, and I don’t mean Reagan, “facts are stubborn things”).

Finally, this tells us that Dick Ebersol is stepping down as head of NBC Sports after contract talks for a four-year deal stalled, bringing to an end (apparently) a storied career in network television; probably his most famous achievement is defining the NBC Sports “brand,” if you will, based on the network’s coverage of the Olympic Games (Ebersol has also overcome horrific personal tragedy, including the loss of his son in a plane crash and his near-demise in the same fashion).

So why am I bothering to say anything at all about him?

Well, awhile ago, I read this fine book about “Saturday Night Live,” which includes more interesting (and usually funny) remembrances from former and current (I believe) cast members than I could possibly recount here. And while there are a few people who are universally hailed (I cannot recall a single negative comment about Gilda Radner, for example), there are some who are not (Harry Shearer, for example, is a funny and talented guy, but apparently he rubbed a lot of people the wrong way during his two turns as a cast member…the only fault of the book as far as I’m concerned is the relentless hosannas to Lorne Michaels, the show’s original and – as far as I know – current producer).

The second of Shearer’s turns, it should be noted, came in the early 1980s while Ebersol was the show’s producer, having stepped in for Michaels for a time. And though Ebersol improved the show’s ratings by loading up the lineup with talent (Billy Crystal, Martin Short, and Christopher Guest, among others), the show definitely lost much of its satiric edge as far as I’m concerned (Ebersol favored performers such as juggler Michael Davis, who was witty I’ll admit, and Harry Anderson and his cockeyed magic acts…Anderson, of “Night Court” fame, also was and still is funny).

However, political humor pretty much disappeared during the Ebersol era (this is borne out by cast remembrances in the book also), including the presidential election year of 1984. I’ll admit that more satiric bits skewering The Sainted Ronnie R would not have made a difference in the electoral outcome, but those would have been welcome anyway (even more jousts at Walter Mondale, Reagan’s Dem opponent in ’84, would have been fine).

Instead, we were treated to such schlocky bits from the Ebersol period as renaming “Weekend Update” “SNL Newsbreak,” with a bolt of lightning supposedly hitting the letters of the show title and raining down debris on Brian Doyle-Murray, the “news anchor.” Apparently, stuff like this was funny to Ebersol.

After Ebersol stepped down and Michaels returned (rebuilding the show around Jon Lovitz, Nora Dunn and the now-execrable Dennis Miller, adding Dana Carvey, Jan Hooks and the great Phil Hartman later), the political edge returned also, with Lovitz as ’88 presidential contender Michael Dukakis, Hartman as Reagan and Carvey of course as Poppy Bush, paving the way for people like Darrell Hammond as Bill Clinton (Hartman did a good turn or two as Number 42 also).

So congratulations once more to Ebersol for his accomplishments. But when it comes to “Saturday Night Live” (a show I really don’t follow any more for a variety of reasons), the program maintained its edge in spite of him, not because of him.

Thursday Stuff

More like this, a lot more (and we may see it)...



...and I'm sure he tore it up at the Tower Theater tonight in these parts.

Thursday Mashup (5/19/11)

I’d better get teh stupid of former Laura Bush employee Andrew Malcolm out of the way first, I suppose (here, concerning Libya and the Middle East in general)…

We froze Col. Kadafi's assets over here a while back and all he did was change hats.

Uh, no – as noted here…

“As of today, at least 30 billion dollars in government of Libya assets under United States jurisdiction have been blocked as a result of the executive order issued by President Obama,” Acting Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David Cohen said on a conference call with reporters. “This is the largest blocking under any sanctions program ever.”

The $30 billion is a sum total of all of the assets that have been blocked, including assets of the government of Libya, the Central Bank of Libya and the Libyan Investment Authority.

…

Obama issued the executive order on Friday freezing the assets of Gaddafi and his children as well as the government of Libya and its agencies. On Saturday, the United Nations Security Council adopted resolution 1970, which froze the assets of Gaddafi and his five children. The UK then adopted complementary sanctions on Sunday and today the EU announced they are in the process of adopting their own sanctions.

I will admit that this by itself is not going to stop the conflict…but then again, maybe if Malcolm’s former boss’s husband hadn’t decided to reward Quaddafi by restoring full relations with him, we might not be in as big of a mess as we are now.

Malcolm also came up with a doozy yesterday that I’m just getting to now, in which he told us of the “secret lesson” of Baby Newton Leroy Gingrich’s hilarious presidential run, which is apparently to not declare too early as Gingrich did, and from that point, Malcolm proceeds to attack President Obama for a supposed never-ending presidential campaign, or something (as noted here, though, Malcolm suffers from Obama Derangement Syndrome anyway).

(I know this stuff is tiresome and definitely is lacking in the “man bites dog” quality of something that is actually newsworthy, but Malcolm is an insect who deserves to be swatted every so often.)

Next, this story from Fix Noise yesterday tells us the following…

The Navy's decision to name a cargo ship now under construction after labor activist Cesar Chavez has drawn sharp criticism from one veteran lawmaker who says that a military war hero should receive the honor instead.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, said he understands the Navy's desire to honor Hispanic leaders, but the Navy may want to skip the politically divisive names and opt for an outstanding service member.

"If this decision were about recognizing the Hispanic community's contribution to our nation, many other names come to mind, including Marine Corps Sergeant Rafael Peralta, who was nominated for the Medal of Honor for action in Iraq. Peralta is one of many Hispanic war heroes -- some of whom are worthy of the same recognition," said Hunter, a Reserve lieutenant in the Marines who says he was informed of the decision by Navy officials Tuesday.

…

Peralta was 25 when he died in a battle in Fallujah, Iraq, in 2004. After he was shot in the head by friendly fire, he pulled a grenade lobbed by an insurgent under his body before it detonated. He was nominated for the Medal of Honor for sacrificing his life to save the lives of several of his fellow comrades.

Peralta has not been awarded the Medal of Honor, but was offered the Navy Cross, the second highest honor in the Navy. His family declined to accept it.

I agree that Sergeant Peralta should receive the Medal of Honor, but I don’t understand the decision of his family to decline the Navy Cross.

Besides, I’m not aware of a litmus test that must be passed in order for a U.S. ship to be named after a notable American. As noted here, a U.S. Army ship is named after General Joseph E. Johnston.

Joseph E. Johnston served in the Confederacy during the Civil War, the bunch that led an armed insurrection against this country. You know, against the Union (the guys in the blue coats). And that’s OK?

I’ve got an idea – let’s name the cargo ship after Chavez, name the next U.S. ship to be built after Sgt. Peralta and call it a deal, all right? And let Duncan Hunter find another issue for which he can be a demagogue.

In addition, Senators Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber from Oklahoma both made the news this week; as noted here, Crazy Tom Coburn bailed on the supposedly august “Gang of Six” that was tasked to come up with some kind of a budget compromise.

Gee, I wonder if a Dem would have gotten a pass from our august corporate media for walking away from a bipartisan commission like this (I could see the screaming headlines now about Durbin, Sherrod Brown, Patty Murray or whoever supposedly not caring about the deficit, along with the typical bloviation from the right-wing echo chamber, had they done this).

Truth be told, I think Coburn actually did us a favor here by deflating this utterly ridiculous exercise (what we need is a jobs commission…wonder if “President Hopey Changey” will ever name one?).

And that now leads us to James Mountain Inhofe (here)…

It's not surprising that Democrats in Washington have no plan to bring down rising gas prices. But make no mistake, they do have a plan - to make them go higher.

That's right: the Democrats, along with President Obama, are advocating policies that will make you pay more at the pump. And that's exactly what they want. Consider President Obama's Energy Secretary, who said, "Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe." That's about $7 to $8 a gallon.

As noted here, Obama has directed the Justice Department to look into speculation in the energy markets that is driving up the price of gas (yeah, Obama wants the price of gas to go up and hurt his re-election prospects – uh huh).

Also, Inhofe’s former Dem U.S. Senate opponent Andrew Rice told us the following here (noting also that Inhofe has received at least $1,076,573 in campaign contributions from Big Oil)…

It's nothing new for Oklahoma's senior senator to try to distract from our energy problems by pointing fingers and shifting blame. Rather than taking responsibility for his own inaction on gas prices and energy independence during his 22 years in Congress, Inhofe chooses to accuse those who disagree with him of "an attempt to misinform and frighten the public" (Inhofe in a July 9, 2002 floor speech) and "fear-mongering" (Inhofe in a January 4, 2005 floor speech). He used two hours of the Senate's time last October to discuss Leonardo DiCaprio, the Weather Channel, and his climate change denial, when he could have used that time to put forward solutions to the growing energy crisis.

During the 14 years Inhofe has been in the Senate, gas prices have nearly quadrupled. Yet he seems content to blame others and takes no responsibility for his own failures. It's time Oklahoma's voters held Jim Inhofe accountable, and it's time we sent him a message that pointing fingers is no way to lead.

Of course, since Rice is a Dem and we’re talking about Oklahoma, he lost (idiots).

Oh, and here’s another Inhofe “funny,” remember (the global warming Al Gore igloo)?

Well, as noted here, the recent extreme weather patterns such as those in Texas and Louisiana were predicted by climate scientists years ago as part of the global warming that is so funny according to Inhofe.

Ha, ha, ha…

Finally, allow me to communicate the results of the primary election in these parts a couple of days ago here, with the following totals:

Pennsbury School Board
All seats for 4-year terms

Region 1: 1 Seat

Republicans

Gene D. Dolnick (I) 507
Steve Kosmorsky 1,526

Democrats

Gene D. Dolnick (I) 1,008
Steve Kosmorsky 693

Region 2: 3 Seats

Democrats

Matthew Arlen 695
Mike Giosa 296
Gallus J. Obert Jr. 551
John Palmer 990
Jacqueline Redner 948
Gary Sanderson (I) 1,075
Dorothy Vislosky 667

Republicans

Matthew Arlen 330
Mike Giosa 166
Gallus J. Obert Jr. 213
John Palmer 179
Jacqueline Redner 186
Gary Sanderson (I) 187
Dorothy Vislosky 311

Region 3: 1 seat

Democrats

Chris Cridge 826
Linda L. Palsky (I) 981

Republicans

Chris Cridge 1,017
Linda L. Palsky (I) 284

So basically, if this had been the general election instead of the primary, based on the voting of “Democrats” who chose to support Steve Kosmorsky, Chris Cridge and Dorothy Vislosky instead of those of their own party, Simon Campbell would now be in charge of the Pennsbury School Board.

Short of guttural profanity, I can’t think of a way to properly communicate my disgust.

Oh, and as noted here today in the Courier Times, “Only 11.56 percent of registered voters in Bucks turned out to the polls in Tuesday’s primary election.”

11.56 percent? That’s how many parents in this school district care about the education of their kids?

On second thought, I think guttural profanity actually works at this moment…

Are you fucking kidding me??

I read this column from Kate Fratti about all this the other day (she being a writer I genuinely respect), and I get what she’s saying here, about everybody having it tough and the teacher’s union having to give on salary and bennies. However, we need to keep the following in mind also…

… it's very hard for some of us to relate to some of the anti-union candidates when it comes to matters other than finance. Region 3 Republican Chris Cridge, for instance, confirms that as a parishioner at St. John the Evangelist Roman Catholic Church, he videotaped sermons by a priest he perceived as too liberal and sent them on to the archdiocese. I think that's weird.

"It was a long time ago," he said. But he makes no apology.

Another keeps a "Don't Tread On Me Sign" on his front lawn, and collects guns. I couldn't get him on the phone to talk about it Tuesday after leaving messages on his phone and with his campaign organizer.

Longtime Democrats ask, "Do we want social conservatives such as these running our schools?"

If your answer is No, then you’d damn well better get off your asses and vote for the Democrats in November, people. And the following came from the comments…

Get ready for the "intelligent design" and "abstinence solution " curriculum push once these folks are in control. That's the real long-term hidden agenda. Bank on it.

If you don’t vote for yourselves this fall, people, at least do it for your kids.

Wednesday PM Stuff

I give you a cautionary (and sickening, truth be told) reminder on our economy from Ed Schultz...



...and as long as we're being robbed, I guess it's just a "short walk" off the cliff when there's nothing left to steal...



...a fate brought to us by these cretinous life forms, among others (oh, go write one of your phony "I Love America" hymns, Saint Orrin)...



Update 5/21/11: And by the way, when it comes to subsidies for Big Oil, let's not forget the vote of "No Corporate Tax" Pat Toomey and his fellow Repugs here.

...and do you know what? Sorry if this is harsh, but maybe it's time to let nature run its course here (yeah, I guess this wasn't a very cheery post).

A Word About Arnold and Maria and John and Liz

Am I the only one who thinks there is something that really stinks about the way our corporate media is covering the breakup of Ahhnold and Maria Shriver?

No, this blog is not turning into The Hollywood Minute and ignoring all of the infinitely more important issues, such as what the hell it is that’s going on in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, and what kind of a blind eye we’re turning in Bahrain and whether or not sanctions against Syria is really a good idea (that is, are we prepared for any adverse consequences?), and also what on earth is going on with Bradley Manning at this moment and whether or not he will ever be officially charged with anything (as well as the real-life-or-death-consequence story of Troy Davis on death row).

I think what has really compelled me to say something is the picture from CNN above, showing “the governator” in an almost heroic pose, and the accompanying story telling us, more or less, that, oh well, divorce is sad but it happens every day, couples have to work at marriage (duh) and sometimes a spouse will stray though it may not “doom a relationship,” and how exactly should the kids handle it (I thought it was particularly ridiculous, by the way, for Dr. Steve Solomon of The Relationship Institute in La Jolla, CA to tell either the cheating or cheated-upon spouse to not tell the kids…does this genius somehow think they won’t find out?).

I’m not saying this because I have an axe in particular to grind against Schwarzenegger or Maria Shriver, or certainly against their kids, or the former guv’s love child. And I hope somehow this mess gets worked out for the betterment of all concerned.

I’m saying this because I notice a distinct difference between the way this story is being reported and the story of the breakup of this couple because of a husband’s infidelity.

OK, so Ahhnold supported the child, which he should have done anyway. That doesn’t make him any less of a lying, deceiving weasel than John Edwards. But I have yet to come across any parody videos of Schwarzenegger sneaking around, playing to his vanity (maybe that stuff is in the works…I just haven’t seen it).

I’ll wait to see if the New York Times, for example, has a multi-page spread on California’s former first couple, giving the coverage that they never received while one of the spouses served in public life.

Also, I would ask just exactly how the hell our media with initials for names apparently found a way to miss this story of Schwarzenegger’s illegitimate progeny for ten years!

Update 1 5/19/11: And as far as I’m concerned, it’s just a “short ride,” if you will, from CNN’s coverage to this.

Update 2 5/19/11: A question for Howie Kurtz based on this - what makes the housekeeper more "private," than, say, Rielle Hunter?

Wednesday AM Stuff

(The first three videos are from a post that disappeared last week when Blogger crashed, for what it's worth.)

This just in: a video press release from the Republican House Congressional Committee in response to this…



…and in a related story, say buh-bye to those 2012 presidential prospects, Willard Mitt – waay too logical for the wingnuts here…



…and as long as we’re talking about health care, let’s not forget this (we should also keep this in mind the next time some political troglodyte, who probably will be a Republican, rejoices over cutting funding to Planned Parenthood)…



...and composer Gustav Mahler died 100 years ago today (the subject of a great Ken Russell film, if you ever come across it).

Tuesday Stuff

See all the fun Mikey The Beloved is missing with his chicken "E-Town Halls" and phone calls? And by the way, Rachel Maddow connects the dots brilliantly here...



...however, I don't believe she included this (Ben Quayle is, of course, a typical Repug stooge - I see the apple doesn't fall far from the proverbial tree)...



Update 5/18/11: God, I hope Alan Grayson is girding for a rematch against this clown.

...and silly Rachel, it's just the "conventional wisdom" that Democrats/liberals/progressives or whatever should only be reported on when there's a scandal or John Edwards is combing his hair, or something (and oh noes, look over there GEORGE SOROS DEATH PANELS TICKING DEBT TIME BOMB UNSUSTAINABLE MEDICARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY and of course ACORN PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACORN PLANNED PARENTHOOD PHILADELPHIA SCARY NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY "SCANDAL"!!!!)...



...and as long as Darrell Issa felt like resurrecting Iran-Contra earlier, the least I can do is put this up in response (J.B. composed some great what-I-guess-you-would-call "protest" music in the '80s, including this tune).

Tuesday Mashup (5/17/11)

I think this is the last bit of “old business” from last week for yours truly to catch up on; freshman Repug U.S. House Rep Adam Kinzinger opined as follows at The Hill (on “Ryan Care,” basically)…

On May 10, 41 of my freshman colleagues and I sent a letter to the President that states the new members of Congress are committed to having a fact-based conversation immediately over reforming spending on entitlement programs and addressing the debt crisis now before it is insurmountable. The letter calls on the President to join House freshmen efforts to stop the political rhetoric, work to advance America’s interests, and end this cycle of debt, deficits and indecision.

I’m sure that entire paragraph was poll-tested by Frank Luntz to make sure it elicited the proper response from those 30 percent “dead enders” who will do anything they’re told by their Repug handlers. However, it doesn’t take a genius to see what is going on here; namely, that the Repugs know what kind of a mess they’ve created for themselves by going all-in on the Paul Ryan Medicare scheme and are trying to drag Obama and the Democrats down with them (here…an update is here).

Though still a House freshman, Kinzinger has shown himself to be seasoned when it comes to “weasel word” prevarications, as noted in this post from Politifact in which we learn as follows (from the election in which he defeated Dem congresswoman Deborah Halvorson last year)…

A Kinzinger spokesman sent us to a web page posted by the Illinois Department of Employment Security. This page provided a new statistic -- the actual number of unemployed Illinois residents, measured every month from January 1976 until the present.

According to these statistics, there were 449,300 unemployed people in Illinois in January 1993, and that number had grown to 671,400 by August 2010. That's 222,100 more unemployed people today than when Halvorson started. So using that measurement, it appeared Kinzinger was correct.

Why the difference? The expanding labor force. Since January 1993, the Illinois labor force has grown by 598,800 people, as people have moved into the state and as Illinois children have grown old enough to begin working. So that makes it possible for there to be more unemployed people even as the state has experienced a net gain of jobs.

So does this mean the statement should be rated True? Not necessarily.

The numbers cited by the Kinzinger camp refer to the increasing number of unemployed people in Illinois. But that doesn't exactly mean that hundreds of thousands of jobs have been lost. Instead, it could mean that the state has failed to create hundreds of thousands of jobs to keep pace with population growth and new entrants into the work force. That's a similar point, but it's not exactly the same thing.

And as noted here, Kinzinger also benefitted from another Breitbart smear alleging that Halvorson was linked a guy named Bill Preston who portrayed Kinzinger and Lonesome Rhodes Beck with Hitler moustaches; Preston said later that he was unaffiliated with the Halvorson campaign…of course, that was after the brouhaha had run its course (and this tells us of criticism over Kinzinger’s military record).

Kinzinger leads off his Hill piece by saying “At present, America’s entitlement programs are towards their last years of solvency.”

A lie is a terrible way to make a first impression, Congressman.

Next, I give you this in a matter pertaining to the Catholic Archdiocese of Philadelphia…

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — The head of the Philadelphia archdiocese's panel on priest sex-abuse is blasting the cardinal's response to the pedophilia crisis, and pulling back the curtain on the panel's long-secret operations.

Cardinal Justin Rigali and his bishops "failed miserably at being open and transparent," review board chairwoman Ana Maria Catanzaro wrote this week in the lay Catholic magazine Commonweal.

"What will it take for bishops to accept that their attitude of superiority and privilege only harms their image and the church's?" Catanzaro wrote in an article titled "The Fog of Scandal."

A grand jury this year criticized the panel and church officials for leaving dozens of problem priests in ministry.

But Catanzaro said the lay board never saw most of them because the archdiocese prescreened which cases they reviewed.

"She should feel very, very used," said Nicholas Cafardi, a Duquesne University law professor who once served as counsel to the Pittsburgh archdiocese. "They're being asked to give credibility to a process that is supposed to involve them but didn't."

I know there really is no excuse for a Catholic to miss Sunday mass, when you get right down to it, and I don’t absolve myself on that either. However, no one should have any illusions as to the disgust of “the flock” guided by “the shepherd” over stuff like this.

However, I wanted to note here that a group of Catholics recently made news for what I consider to be a better example of imitating His behavior, as it were (here)…

Washington D.C., May 12, 2011 / 07:34 pm (CNA).- Ahead of House Speaker John Boehner’s May 14 commencement address at the Catholic University of America, over 75 professors from Catholic universities have written a letter criticizing the Ohio Republican’s budget proposal.

…

The letter from academics said Boehner’s voting record is at variance from the ancient Christian teaching that those in power are “morally obliged to preference the needs of the poor.”

“Your record in support of legislation to address the desperate needs of the poor is among the worst in Congress,” they charged.

The letter said the 2012 budget Boehner supported is “particularly cruel” to pregnant women and children, as it cuts $500 million from the Women Infants and Children nutrition program. The letter also criticized the budget’s cuts to Medicaid and Medicare and its “$3 trillion in new tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.”

And of course, the letter met with the predictable outcry from self-appointed Catholic “spokesman” Bill Donahue, who said the letter was “not representative of Catholic sentiment.”

I would ask in response that you keep in mind that Donahue does not serve as a spokesperson for the Church in any official capacity whatsoever (and, the last I checked, he was trying to whip up more “culture war” BS, as noted here).

Further, I came across more nonsense from Darrell Issa, as noted at The Daily Tucker (here)…

Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and the Chairman of the powerful House Oversight Committee, expressed more confidence in his committee’s investigation into President Obama’s Department of Justice policies surrounding Project Gunrunner and Operation Fast and Furious, comparing it to the Iran-Contra scandal.

Issa told radio host Rick Amato that it is “not unprecedented” for government agencies, like the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), to refuse to honor Congressional subpoenas.

“This looks an awful lot like Iran Contra,” Issa said. “When a government agency makes a mistake they stall, delay and cover up. That’s what’s happening here.”

Even for Issa, this statement is preposterous (I realize he’s just doing his part as a member of the right-wing echo chamber, but that still doesn’t make it right).

As reported by an actual news organization that is somewhat reputable here, the intent of “Project Gunrunner” was “to stop the flow of weapons from the US to Mexico's drug cartels.” However, in the process of doing so, approximately 2,500 guns ended up in circulation, including 575 AK-47 type semi-automatic rifles; one of these weapons may have been used to kill Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry (not 100 percent sure of the timeline here, I’ll admit…my sympathies to his family and friends).

From what I read, “Project Gunrunner” was a pretty stupid idea. However, do you want to know what is more stupid, as far as I’m concerned? The fact that the assault weapons ban was allowed to lapse in 2004 under the thoroughly misguided watch of Former President Highest Disapproval Rating In Gallup Poll History. And stupider still is the fact that no common-sense gun legislation is even being contemplated by this Congress, including the bills from Carolyn Maloney or Peter King (and Issa is every bit to blame for that as anyone else on Capitol Hill).

God knows how many people have been killed on both sides of the border as a result (and once again, I’d like an NRA member to explain to me why a hunter would need an assault rifle or even a 30-round clip).

Stupidest of all, though, is to compare the idiocy of “Project Gunrunner” to the Iran-Contra scandal, in which a doddering former president allowed a renegade foreign policy apparatus to illegally sell arms to an outlaw regime to fuel a South American insurgency (if and when it turns out that Obama has signed off on “Gunrunner,” something I seriously doubt, let me know, OK?).

Update 8/22/11: Looks like right-wing propagandist Christine Flowers is about three months behind on her talking points here...

Finally, I wanted to highlight the follow Op-Ed in the New York Times recently by John C. Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group based in Malvern, PA…

SHOULD Home Depot’s board report each year on the company’s political policies and spending? In a groundbreaking vote at the company’s June 2 annual meeting, Home Depot’s shareholders will have the chance to vote on a nonbinding resolution of support for the company’s policies on, and future plans for, political contributions.

The vote was made possible because the Securities and Exchange Commission rightly decided in March to allow proxy proposals that require public companies to permit their shareholders to weigh in on their political spending.

This means that, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision last year that laws limiting corporate political contributions violate constitutional free speech principles, the game is far from over. Shareholders — not self-interested corporate managers — should, and can, decide policies on corporate political contributions.

What makes this strengthening of shareholder rights particularly important is that over the past 50 years control of corporate America has shifted from individual stockholders to institutional stockholders. But these institutional investors have been unwilling to challenge political activities by corporate boards, even when those activities are not in their shareholders’ interests.

For anyone unfamiliar with Bogle and Vanguard, I should note that he is all about shareholder participation in money management decisions as well as charging low (relative to the mutual fund biz) fees to attract customers. He has also argued that so-called “index” funds (with securities that comprise common “indices” of funds such as the S&P 500) will outperform actively managed mutual funds over time, and the last I checked, he was still right.

I think this Op-Ed is important since he is calling for institutional shareholders to make the companies in which they have an ownership stake do the right thing when it comes to declaring their political contributions (Bogle plainly does not agree with the ruling by The Supremes in the Citizens United case). And absent the passing and signing into law of legislation such as the DISCLOSE Act, this may be the next arena, if you will, in which we should engage those who would consolidate the corporate voice at the expense of our own once and for all.

Monday Stuff

Before there were the Koch Brothers, there were the Rockefellers - yesterday marked the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling that Standard Oil was an "unreasonable" monopoly...



...and kudos to Carlos Santana for speaking truth to stoo-pid here.

Monday Mashup (5/16/11)

This is a link to the Area Votes in Congress writeup in the Philadelphia Inquirer from May 8th (not yesterday, which I’ll get to later). It’s late primarily because of last week’s Blogger kerfuffle.

There’s not a lot to say, though, except to point out that the House sent three measures to the Senate that have virtually no chance of becoming law unless Congress managed to override the inevitable (and justifiable) veto of President Obama in all three instances.

The first measure pertains to the HR 3 Chris Smith anti-abortion atrocity, including the truly vile “rape audits” (with unanimous Yes votes by all local House Repugs including Mikey The Beloved and No votes by all Dems except Tim Holden). The second measure concerns establishing the state-run health exchanges (same as above – if Holden had any guts, he would just switch parties and make it official), and the third pertained to school-based health clinics (which, for some reason, Holden supported…all other votes were the same).

One of the votes included an extension of oil industry tax breaks, including Yes votes from all House Repugs. The sole Senate vote was to confirm John J. McConnell, 52, as a judge on the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island (50-44, along party lines).

And as long as I’m talking about Congress, I give you the following concerning the E-Town Hall that our Repug PA-08 U.S. House Rep held recently (here)…

"We're thrilled it was a great turnout. The congressman answered 22 questions over the hour. We got about 60 questions, many of which were repeats. We covered a lot of ground," said executive editor Pat Walker (of the Bucks County Courier Times, which removed anything difficult did their best to avoid controversy thoroughly fluffed our congressman screened his questions).

Continuing…

Fitzpatrick (said) that job creation is his "number one priority" and that he meets every week with small businesses to discuss what they need to create jobs.

"There's general universal agreement that the primary source of new jobs is in the private sector, and shouldn't be in the public sector. That is why I have supported many efforts in the past four months to reduce the size of government, reduce spending, and create an environment where small business job creators can succeed," he wrote.

In response, I give you this once more…



Continuing…

On the subject of Medicare, Fitzpatrick said that "no person over the age of 54 years old will see any deduction or change at all in their Medicare benefits."

In response to a question about applying spending toward restoring roads, bridges and tunnels, Fitzpatrick said he just agreed to co-sponsor a bill that would invest in infrastructure.

Wow, this sure is some big-time “reporting” from Mikey’s PR service, isn’t it? So basically, according to Mikey, no one over 54 has anything to worry about (and why that number, I ask myself? How about 22? 87?). The trouble is, as has been pointed out over and over and over, the “Ryan Care” voucher a participant would receive on the dreaded day that Medicare is privatized would do nothing to contain costs of care.

And as far as Mikey co-sponsoring an infrastructure bill…well, more details would have been nice, wouldn’t it (such as the number of the bill, other co-sponsors, how the bill would be funded, etc.).

On top of that, if you want to hear something really disturbing, I’m hearing that the Repug poobahs in Harrisburg may redraw some of the districts in this state to favor a greater Repug voter registration, such as PA-08 (which would ensure that there was never a repeat of the scenario where Patrick Murphy barely lost Bucks in ’06, but defeated Fitzpatrick by taking just enough of the district from Philadelphia and Montgomery County).

Stay tuned.

Next, I had to impart this bit of comedy from the New York Times over the weekend concerning John Ensign’s legal troubles (here)…

The (Senate) Ethics Committee’s 68-page report…offers a blistering day-by-day account of what it portrayed as lies and deception, and an almost lurid description of (Ensign’s) affair and its consequences. It describes efforts by Mr. Ensign to keep the affair going even after Mrs. (Cynthia) Hampton pleaded to cut it off. The senator used multiple cell phone accounts and fired Mr. (Douglas) Hampton in part so that he could not track the senator’s schedule, the report said.

The report also catalogs efforts by the senator’s friends to keep him away from Mrs. Hampton. When the senator was caught in a Nevada hotel room with Mrs. Hampton after he had vowed multiple times to end the affair, he received an angry phone call there from Timothy Coe, a prominent Christian fundamentalist and adviser to Mr. Ensign.

“I know exactly where you are,” Mr. Coe reportedly told the senator, according to the Ethics Committee report. “I know exactly what you are doing. Put your pants on and go home.”

And this from a guy who once claimed that Bill Clinton “has no credibility left,” for the Monica Whatsername stuff (here).

Finally, I have some local Bucks County, PA (and Lower Makefield/Pennsbury in particular) stuff to discuss.

The other day, what should arrive at Le Manse Doomsy in the mail but a 56-page booklet on 8 ½ x 11 paper from teacher union antagonist Simon Campbell and his front group, Stop Teachers Strikes. It is full of anti-teacher cartoons and propaganda about “the public school employee pension crisis,” how “it pays to be a union boss,” and the evils of “compulsory unionism.”

The booklet also lists the salary, pension, and full benefit costs of every teacher, administrator and employee in the Pennsbury School District.

Mrs. Doomsy and I both looked at it and nearly fell over. And no, not because we were bowled over by the compensation of the district’s employees (truth be told, most of them are working more cheaply than I imagined).

No…we were astonished because we never imagined that anyone, even a human stain like Campbell, could do something so outrageous as to publish each employee’s compensation like that (to say nothing of the cost of publishing and mailing something like this throughout the school district). Yes, it is a matter of public record, but just imagine any college student entertaining a notion of whether or not they ever want to teach, knowing they could be subject one day to the same treatment.

And yes, the pension issue is a legitimate one. But how are teachers at fault who have paid into the fund for their whole careers, while politicians in this state and across the country have defaulted on their obligations on behalf of these public sector employees?

This makes it even more important that all of us in Pennsbury vote for Gene Dolnick, John Palmer, Jacqueline Redner, Gary Sanderson, and Linda L. Palsky for the school board tomorrow. It also tells me more than a little bit about Campbell, by the way, that, when you browse the Stop Teachers Strikes site, you can’t tell which Campbell-backed candidates are running for school board (Steve Kosmorsky, Chris Cridge, and Dorothy Vislosky).

Also, as noted here, there are many other fine Democrats on the ballot for tomorrow, including Diane Marseglia and Det Ansinn for County Commissioner. Also, please vote for Ken Seda and Ron Schmid for Lower Makefield Supervisor, along with Independent Ron Smith.

Update 5/17/11: I'm smacking myself in the forehead with an open palm at this minute for not pointing out that Ron Smith won't be on the ballot for LMT Supervisor until this November - my bad.

Friday Stuff

Because of the recent Blogger kerfuffle, I’ve now got a bunch of stuff in my “in” box that I’ll try to get to as soon as I can.

In the meantime, to help keep this ad on the air, click here…



…and good for Jon Stewart; as “values” issues go, this one is particularly stupid (and as Think Progress notes here, Dubya once hosted a “Russell Simmons Def Comedy Jam” at the White House full of people who hated the Iraq war, and what did we hear from the wingnutosphere? Cue the sound of crickets…again.)…

The Daily Show
Tags: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

…and yep, keep turning up the heat on the Koch Brothers (and kudos to Reverend Billy...more here)…



…and gee, just a little retro, huh (in the look, anyway).

At Long Last, Baby Newton Leroy Enters The Fray

(Note: I will attempt to regenerate this from yesterday…love and kisses to Blogger for crashing and blowing up this post…)

I have to admit that I was a bit surprised by the news that disgraced former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich finally decided to go “all in” for the Repug 2012 presidential nomination, but based on this, he has (I mean, I thought he was doing so well in his role as pundit/consultant/right-wing media personality…a move like this will only dredge up a whole bunch of stuff that will remind voters how truly awful Gingrich was when he held public office).

And as part of that effort, I hereby offer the following:

As noted here…

Gingrich dismantled the committee system that had evolved in the decades following the revolt against Speaker Joe Cannon in 1911. He reduced committee staffs, diminished the authority of committee chairs, and reached around ranking Republican committee members to promote his loyalists, ignoring the established seniority system. The chairs he put in place were required to take loyalty oaths, making them an extension of the leadership office. Gingrich also reserved a large number of desirable committee appointments for freshman he helped elect in 1994. The result was a shift from a “committee-based process” to a “partisan leadership-based process.” Power that had been diffused among committee chairs was and remains concentrated in the leadership.

Continuing…

Here, he waited for the voters to come to him in 2008 asking him to run (they didn’t, as it turned out…the post tells us more on the fundraising tactics of Gingrich that are now boilerplate for the Repugs as a party).

Here, he said we need “a different set of rules” to fight terrorism, uttered the mindless tautology “Real Change Requires Real Change” and advocated for funding science and R&D even though he proposed funding cuts in those areas during his ruinous term as House Speaker.

Here, he “quoted poetry, studies, historians, Greeks, (and) the moderns” over dinner with Paul Wolfowitz while Rummy aide Steve Herbits tried to get Newt and Wolfie to come up with a way to convince Dubya in’04 that “deadlines have their virtues” when it comes to our troops in Iraq here (from “State of Denial” By Bob Woodward…made even more ridiculous when you realize that he bailed on serving our country here).

Here, he called for a “space-based, air traffic control system” along with other stuff like redirecting oil from the strategic petroleum reserve, cutting the census budget, establishing national “right to work” legislation and making English the official language…and speaking of language, Gingrich referred to Spanish as “the language of living in the ghetto” here.

He was promoted as an “idea factory” by Matt Bai of the New York Times here and here (notice the story doesn’t say good ideas).

Here, he said he thought he was “closer to Benjamin Franklin than George Washington” (not lacking in the ego department, of course).

Here, he blamed the 2009 Virginia Tech shootings on “liberalism” (what a creep).

Here, he wanted to “cut the corporate tax rate from about 35 to 12 percent, eliminate the estate and gains taxes (of course), and implement a two-year, 50-percent payroll tax reduction.”

He said we should “repeal health care” here.

He said Obama “cares more about protecting the rights of terrorists than Americans” here (uh huh, and that’s why he was the president who got bin Laden instead of Dubya or Bill Clinton).

He originally proposed only two months of welfare for women and children who qualified for assistance here (so much for the Beltway mythology that he and Bill Clinton crafted some kind of solution on this way back when…basically, “The Big Dog” had to drag Newt kicking and screaming, as per usual).

Oh, and while Flush Limbore screamed about the so-called “Slaughter solution” for passing health care reform under a “deem and pass” measure through a self-executing rule, it should be noted that, while Gingrich was House speaker, Republicans “soon lost their aversion to self-executing rules (when they took power in that body in 1995) and proceeded to set new records under Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). There were 38 and 52 self-executing rules in the 104th and 105th Congresses (1995-1998), making up 25 percent and 35 percent of all rules, respectively (here).

Here, he described the 2010 election as an ideological battle between “paychecks and food stamps,” totally forgetting of course that, at this point, one in eight Americans receive food stamps (and if that isn’t a depressing economic indicator, I don’t know what is).

He said “the world” was happy with the GOP election result in 2010, when in reality, quite the opposite is true here.

As noted here, James Cole, the deputy U.S. AG who received a recess appointment by President Obama (who I recently posted about here) was the guy who unraveled the hidden, interlocking network of non-profits used by Gingrich (popularly referred to as "Newt, Inc.") to finance a jet-setting political lifestyle that, once revealed, forced him from office and brought down a $300,000 fine on his head.

Gingrich said Obama has “diminish(ed) churches and charities,” even though the Murdoch Street Journal, of all places, said here that “President Barack Obama's willingness to keep Bush-era policies on government-backed religious charities opposed by many liberals is helping to woo traditionally Republican evangelical leaders who can influence key blocs of voters.”

He wants to abolish the EPA, as noted here.

He said the U.S. should “go to war with Libya” because NATO “won’t bring much to the fight” here (not surprising I guess for someone who was able to escape military service as noted above).

He called for a ban in response to the imaginary threat of Shia law here.

Gingrich is being bankrolled by Sheldon Adelson, “a casino mogul with legal woes,” as noted here (Adelson is actually a lot more than that; among other things he was the “sugar daddy” behind Freedom’s Watch, a group of Iraq war cheerleaders that also included Ed Snider of Comcast and the Philadelphia 76ers/Flyers).

As an exclamation point of sorts (and perhaps as a bit of a mea culpa for its fawning coverage), the New York Times also took the proverbial stroll down memory sewer with the recently-declared-for-president nominee here.

It really tells you something about how pitiful the executive field is for the “loyal opposition” and the party currently in charge of the U.S. House that someone with Gingrich’s toxic history is actually taken seriously, but that is where we are. And I’m sure we can look forward to at least another year of bombastic propaganda and self-serving faux moralism from this (among other things) serial philanderer (and here and here are updates from yesterday).

God, I hope he wins the nomination!

Update 5/14/11: Keep digging that hole, Newt.

Update 5/15/11: WAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

Update 1 5/17/11: WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Update 2 5/17/11: Just say "oops" and get out, Newt.

Wednesday Stuff

Not sure about posting today, so here are a couple of videos instead (drink up, fellow citizens of our beloved commonwealth, while you can - more here)...



...and yeah, I was wondering if someone in our media was going to react to this too - fortunately, Jon Stewart did here (as usual, waay too much non-pushback against the Bushco cretins).

The Daily Show
Tags: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

Tuesday Stuff

Oh, and concerning the Repug candidates debate, it looks like we didn't miss much (and just once I'd like to see one of these nitwits called out for claiming that "gumint" is in the way of our wonderful, job-creating private industry machine, which really isn't doing much these days)...

The Daily Show
Tags: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

...and happy 65th birthday to Dave Mason - sorry, no video.

Tuesday Mashup (5/10/11)

I give you the following from Fix Noise here…

President Obama's nominee to be Attorney General Eric Holder's top deputy at the Justice Department crashed into a Republican roadblock in the U.S. Senate on Monday, garnering just 50 votes, 10 short of the number needed to break a GOP-led filibuster. Dick Lugar of Indiana was the lone Republican to support the nomination. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., switched his vote at the last minute to 'no' in order to have the vote reconsidered at a later date.

James Cole, a veteran Washington attorney nominated in May, had been serving in the position since late December courtesy of a presidential recess appointment, one that expires at the end of the current session of Congress. And despite the bipartisan support of eight former attorneys general, Republicans remained steadfast in their opposition, though nothing about Monday night's vote changes Cole's temporary job status.

GOP problems with the deputy attorney general are two-fold. Not only is there concern about Cole's tenure as an independent consultant to insurance industry giant AIG prior to the company's near-collapse in 2008 and its subsequent government bailout, but Republicans also voiced strong concern about what they believe to be his soft-on-terrorism stance.

Oh yes, how dare that dastardly James Cole favor trying terrorists in civilian court as opposed to military commissions. What, is he actually trying to convict these people instead of making political hay?

I realize that a well-connected individual like Cole really doesn’t need me to plead a case for the job of deputy AG that he’ll probably get as a recess appointment once more. And I suppose you could argue that he could’ve blown a whistle or two on AIG but didn’t do so. However, I think it’s laughable to hear Grassley carry on against AIG when, as noted here, he voted against the financial reform measure that at least represents something to try and head off the next “bubble to bust” economic cycle that would no doubt reap more millions for AIG and their fellow crooks.

As noted here, though, concerning another Obama recess appointment…

Chuck Grassley’s press release Monday afternoon decrying the recess appointment of Undersecretary of Treasury Jeffrey Goldstein is a case of the Republican’s intentional stalling of the cleanup of Wall Street because of his lifelong commitment to deregulation.

President Obama nominated Jeffrey Goldstein as Undersecretary of Treasury for Domestic Finance to clean up the Wall Street mess caused by Chuck Grassley’s lifelong commitment to deregulation. Mr. Goldstein had been waiting to have his nomination voted out of the Finance Committee for 248 days when the President made the recess appointment.

By contrast Ronald Reagan’s nominee for Undersecretary of Treasury Roger W. Mehle, Jr., who vigorously pursued the deregulation of Wall Street, was nominated on March 3, 1981, testified before the Senate Finance Committee on April 23 and 28, 1981, and was confirmed on July 13, 1981, for a total of 132 days. The Finance Committee finished its hearings on Mehle in 56 days.

Chuck Grassley as a freshman U.S. Senator voted to confirm a disciple of Wall Street deregulation in 132 days, but couldn’t even finish vetting the person nominated to clean up the mess in 248 days. Chuck Grassley’s slow pace in vetting and confirming Jeffrey Goldstein is proof that he doesn’t want to clean up the Wall Street mess caused by his lifelong commitment to deregulation.

Also (from here)…

If the controversy over Cole were simply about the large AIG stain on an otherwise distinguished career, we might consider this as just another case of “failing upward” in our nation’s capital. But the fact that the man appears to have his head screwed on straight in War on Terror terms is quite remarkable. I don’t believe there’s another example of an anti-Terror Warrior at this level in the Obama administration. How’d he get by the personnel vetters in the White House? Cole and Holder must be some pals. And Holder is likely out of chits with the President for the foreseeable future. The progressive media might seek Cole out for his views on germane topics. He might become a regular on “Democracy Now!” If Cole adds even a little sanity and balance to an Obama Justice Department heretofore determined to wage the War on Terror nearly as furiously as The Decider, the recess appointment will have been worth it.

And as noted here, Grassley has no problem smearing those who would see justice done even on behalf of some of the most execrable people on earth (besides AIG, I mean).

Next, Repug U.S. House Rep Lamar Smith of Texas (natch) opines as follows here…

A recent editorial, “The fight for the DREAM Act: Faltered but not fallen,” tells only one side of the story.

It’s easy to be sympathetic to illegal immigrant children who were brought here by their parents. Because their parents disregarded America’s immigration laws, they are in a difficult position. But by granting citizenship, the United States would actually reward their illegal immigrant parents who knowingly violated our laws.

The DREAM Act perpetuates the problem it claims to solve and penalizes citizens and legal immigrants. Once they become citizens, illegal immigrants could petition for their parents to be legalized. The parents could then bring in others in an endless chain.

This would undoubtedly encourage more illegal immigration.

In response I give you this (here)…

The DREAM Act would have made eligible for citizenship immigrants who were brought to the country illegally before age 16 and served in the military or went to college for two years.

If the so-called DREAMers met all the requirements for eventual citizenship, they would be awarded conditional residency for a period of 10 years, during which they had to complete the college or military service requirements and stay out of trouble.

After becoming a permanent resident, an applicant would have to wait an additional three years before applying for citizenship.

Once U.S. citizens — which could be 15 to 20 years after they first applied under the act — DREAMers could petition for parents or siblings to gain legal status.

So sure, maybe after 15-20 years, those who would have completed their college degree or military service could petition to obtain legal status for their parents. However, if they were to meet those requirements, I personally would not have an issue with that.

Smith also tells us that…

The president wasn't able to pass the DREAM Act when he had large Democratic majorities in the House and Senate because of bipartisan opposition. And American families opposed it, too.

Well, that doesn’t square with the Gallup polling results noted here from last December, in which a “slim majority” approved the DREAM Act.

This is typical for Smith who, as noted here, wants to end “birthright citizenship” altogether (though doing that kind of flies in the face, as it were, of the U.S. Constitution those zany teabaggers courted by Smith claim to love). Also, as noted here, Smith once claimed that border violence took 28,000 lives, which Politifact said was a lie (the number was closer to 12,000…also, a good response to The Orange One on that issue is here).

Finally, in local area political stuff here in Bucks County, I give you the following…

I keep hearing about Better Pennsbury, the special interest group that brought us Simon Campbell and Allan Weisel. These two school board members were recently responsible for derailing a meeting with a state mediator between negotiators for the school board and the teachers union.

Well, they are offering us a new slate of candidates. I have been skeptical of this group since receiving a slanted email warning me of the impending doom facing our school district if action was not swift and immediate. I visited their website to see what positive actions they recommend for making a Better Pennsbury. To my dismay, this is what I found:

Home page: Six articles attacking the teachers union and none on improving education, providing rewarding experiences for students, or anything actually related to the education of children.

Issues page: Five topic areas devoted to misleading tax fears and anti-union rhetoric. Again, none on improving education, providing rewarding experiences for students, or anything actually related to the education of children.

Salaries page: An entire page devoted to providing public information that is already public, and making it seem like it was being kept secret from the poor unsuspecting taxpayer, adding an attack on teachers as a bonus.

What's New page: Once again providing public information, that is already public, and again leaving the underlying message that this information has been kept from the poor unsuspecting taxpayer in the past. And surprise, surprise, more anti-union rhetoric.

It seems to me that this group, and the candidates they support, have only one suggestion to create a Better Pennsbury ... get rid of the union. Now I know many of us have differing opinions about the value of unions and what they have meant to the American workforce, but we can all agree that they are not the root of all evil. Eliminating the unions will not right any shortcoming in the American education system. It is not the silver bullet that will forever take away the concern of higher property taxes.

Fooling us once by hiding your one-goal agenda under a name like Better Pennsbury, shame on you! Fooling us again by getting us to vote for your one-goal candidates, shame on us! Let's tell this vocal minority, we won't be fooled again. Vote on May 17 for candidates who are truly interested in taxpayers and education.

Region 1: Gene Dolnick.
Region 2: John Palmer, Jacqueline Redner and Gary Sanderson
Region 3: Linda L. Palsky

Kevin Kopp
Lower Makefield

One of the individuals running for the Pennsbury school board from “Better Pennsbury” is Steve Kosmorsky, someone who pretty much was recruited by Campbell and Weisel to be their rubber stamp in pursuit of a teacher’s strike (which is Better Pennsbury’s ultimate goal). Kosmorsky actually visited Le Manse Doomsy a month or so ago, and I’ll give him credit for making a professional appearance. However, I later checked his information on teacher salaries and benefits for the school district and found out that they were pretty much BS for anyone who was either new or had about 5 or so years of experience in the field. Kosmorsky also stressed the urgency of reining in the supposedly grandiose salaries and perks being awarded to Pennsbury teachers because of Harrisburg’s money troubles, and I said that the troubles in Harrisburg wouldn’t be what they are if Tom “Space Cadet” Corbett hadn’t shoveled money out the door to his pals with tax cuts; in response, Kosmorsky ignored what I said and continued with his spiel.

On top of the school board elections, I would remind anyone out there in Lower Makefield that we’re going to be voting for three township supervisors on May 17th also, and we really need to get behind Ken Seda and Ron Schmid, and Ron Smith running for re-election as an independent. We’re already seeing the effects of majority Republican rule in our township (crumbling roads – and yes, I know local economies have it tough all over – and zero funding for preserving open space); I remember what it was like the last time Republicans ruled our board for an extended duration (hell, we wouldn’t even have been able to watch the proceedings had it not been for Dem Steve Santarsiero), and I don’t want to see that again.