
As reported in last Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer,
here is how Philadelphia-area members of Congress were recorded on major roll-call votes for the week ending Friday February 27th.
House
Fiscal 2009 budget and congressional pay. Voting 245-178, the House on Wednesday sent the Senate a $410 billion appropriations bill (HR 1105) to fund agencies now on stopgap budgets. The Democratic-led Congress last year approved regular 2009 defense, veterans and homeland-security budgets, but delayed this bill to await a Democratic president. The bill denies a congressional pay raise in 2009.
A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate.
Voting yes: John Adler (D., N.J.), Robert E. Andrews (D., N.J.), Robert A. Brady (D., Pa.), Michael N. Castle (R., Del.), Charles W. Dent (R., Pa.), Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.), Jim Gerlach (R., Pa.), Tim Holden (D., Pa.), Frank A. LoBiondo (R., N.J.), Patrick Murphy (D., Pa.), Allyson Y. Schwartz (D., Pa.), and Joe Sestak (D., Pa.).
Voting no: Joseph R. Pitts (R., Pa.) and Christopher H. Smith (R., N.J.).
Jumping ahead a bit, I should note that this ended up getting stalled in the Senate over earmarks (please…yes, I know it’s not the best practice, but that’s a fight for another day, people), and in addition to the typical Repug suspects, Evan Bayh and (shockingly) Russ Feingold have their finger prints all over this one (
here).
The last I heard, Senate and House Dems were scrambling to pass a five-day emergency funding bill (with the Repugs yammering about a “spending freeze”…I thought Rachel Maddow and Ana Marie Cox hammered that one pretty well here).
And if you guessed that this was this week’s stupid “No” vote by Joe Pitts (with Chris Smith as an equally seamy collaborator), then you win a free commemorative “As A Dutiful Republican, I Pledged My Loyalty To Party Leader Rush Limbaugh And All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt” T-Shirt.
Ethics and earmarks. Voting 226-182, the House on Wednesday killed a motion (H Res 189) to open an Ethics Committee probe of any suspect links between House members' receipt of campaign contributions and their sponsorship of earmarks that benefit the contributor.
A yes vote was to table the motion.
Voting yes: Adler, Andrews, Brady, Fattah, Murphy, Holden, Schwartz and Sestak.
Voting no: Castle, Gerlach, LoBiondo, Pitts and Smith.
Not voting: Dent
Gee, this would’ve been nice to have during that seamy little business
here with former House Speaker Denny Hastert and that little earmark episode involving the Prairie Parkway in Illinois, huh?
Oh, and speaking of earmark hypocrisy...
No comments:
Post a Comment