…and from the “better late than never” department, I give you this from Joy Reid (nice to replay this video sometime around, oh, say, the summer of 2018, huh? And with a Dem in An Oval Office – wishing, hoping…)…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ab99/8ab99de86ee2d2d3cec7408d934946886f5ba2c8" alt=""
"I could argue that we're much safer without Saddam," he added. "And I would argue that the people of Iraq have a better shot at living in a peaceful -- a peaceful state."Former Commander Codpiece is wrong as usual, bringing to mind this tune once more.
A "hypothetical" where Iraqis have "a better shot" at peace is a far cry from democratic nation-building, given recent developments -- the rise of the Islamic State, for one -- that have yet to give way to stability.
But Bush argued that his successor was to blame, because the U.S. failed to maintain a troop presence in the country. He noted that "in 2009 and 2010, the violence in Iraq was settling down. And the democracy, even though it was not perfect -- kind of like ours was initially not perfect -- was beginning to work."
No comments:
Post a Comment