tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13419760.post3821928893025595048..comments2024-02-23T02:18:11.366-08:00Comments on The Liberal Doomsayer: More "Clucking Around" On Edwardsdoomsyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06398846941235150923noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13419760.post-37900773950081128532008-01-23T14:47:00.000-08:002008-01-23T14:47:00.000-08:00OK, I’ll admit that I didn’t note that the story p...OK, I’ll admit that I didn’t note that the story pertained to a percentage decline in terms of visit length as opposed to an actual visit in its entirety, which apparently was my erroneous assumption…but this doesn’t amount to a decline in readership? I’d be more concerned with trying to shore up that sad 63.8 percent number instead of splitting hairs over whether or not we’re talking about a decline in per-visit length or actual site visits.<BR/><BR/>And nothing to say about Glenn Greenwald’s numbers I see – things don’t look good for Edwards overall at the moment, I’ll admit, but a little balance would be nice, wouldn’t it?<BR/><BR/>And I seem to recall you were looking once for a “sheriff” for the Internet to monitor blogger content or something last July. Any luck with that?doomsyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06398846941235150923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13419760.post-6907383113198886562008-01-23T14:28:00.000-08:002008-01-23T14:28:00.000-08:00Try to be accurate, at least. The study that you m...Try to be accurate, at least. The study that you mention does NOT measure a decline in the readership of philly.com. Rather, as the story you linked to makes clear, the study refers to a decline in the average time that a reader spends on the site. Obviously, no decline is good, by any measurment. But you should at least get your facts straight. And I'm on an independent platform anyway; I get a lot of blog traffic from people who never go to philly.com.Dick Polmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14647850712013270412noreply@blogger.com